Quote:
Originally Posted by HooKs  When u have a team of volunteers that works in a tough environment and lacks the tools and sufficient finance, its not fair to keep on criticizing their work. |
yes it is, especially when u consider that tayyar.org's performance reflects on FPM as a party and FPMers as individuals. It's an official site, credibility and transparency ought to be a must. Mistakes are tolerated once or twice, but not repeatedly.
FPM has an image to maintain.
Quote:
|
Secondly, given that the effort invested by the tayyar.org team is tremendous compared to the resources under their disposal, a marginal mistake should be overlooked.
|
Hats off to tayyar.org team for their dedication and hard work, but this is besides the point.
By the way, omitting mentioning results whenever FPM loses is not a minor mistake. Publishing Wahhab defamatory comments against the Gemayel Family is not just a minor mistake. Interviewing ppl like Emile Emile Lahoud, Wahhab, etc... is not just a minor mistake.
Quote:
|
Besides, what is being criticized isn`t at all accurate, since tayyar.org supplies various reports from a very wide range of media outlets. Depending on the sort of news reported of the issue of the day most covered, it happens that on some occasions u find the majority of the news reported r cited from a couple of sources. There were many times where the loyalist media was dominant among the articles cited, and no this wasn`t in the far past.
|
I somewhat agree. But a little less number of articles from "Al Akhbar" wouldn't hurt.
Quote:
Opening a thread after another just for the sake of it, is not a constructive criticism.
After all we r talking about a "partisan website" that offers a news service, and that competes with the best independent or professional establishments in this industry.
|
now u're just judging on intentions. Why are u assuming the thread creator is not having the best intentions in mind, and this his goal is not positive criticism?
Quote:
|
Last but not least dear vego, considering the above, this is called negative criticism.
|
I fail to see it. These days, the slightest criticism is being categorized in the "negative criticism" section.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John A do you want to see "Aoun is syrian" articles on tayyar.org ?
this is what annahar and albalad do (in addition to the blue liepapers) . |
Not all articles on Annahar and Al Balad are Aoun and FPM bashing. There are still some good writers in these newspapers. Tab lets' forget the political articles in these newspapers, why not publish the social/environmental/economic articles of these 2 papers? Both of them excel (compared to some others) in these domains.
12th April 2008
), and all these three are not pro-opposition.
