Quote:
Originally Posted by Qifa Nabki I think it's a little bit counterproductive to justify GB's appointment by saying: Look at Saad! Look at George W. Bush! Look at Nayla Tueni! They all benefited from nepotism, so why shouldn't Gebran?
If you're going to argue in favor of his appointment, then do so on the basis of his qualifications and the skills that he brings to the table (as some of you have argued).
Don't say: it's ok because everyone else does it.
And also, don't say: it's ok because he has been with the Tayyar forever. That's not enough of a reason to make someone a minister. They need to have real talent and abilities and a vision. I don't know that GB has those qualities, but I also don't know that he does not either. |
my answer to the point of Bush was in reply to political feudalism that i quite clearly quoted. it is not a matter of who benefits or not, it is a matter that just because GB married GM's daughter then he should sit home and take care of the kids :s
my opinion is the strength of the tayyar as a party, for me it doesnt matter who is in charge of some ministry and i am sure it is not all the work of GB but FPM is assisting him, and will assist anyone in his place.
what i was defending is the point abou el zouz always brings up together "nepotism" and feudal systems