The so called 3orf of not appointing election losers as ministers

[vegojimbo]

Originally Posted by hhhh23

But, to make the statements of FM guys precise, they usually claim that no losers can be appointed as ministers in the FIRST government after the elections (right after the elections). The government of Bassil, Lahoud and Mario Aoun is the 2nd after the elections.
.

I indeed do giggle at this "first government" statement. What difference does it make if it's the first gov or not? Is it a habit to have many governments between 2 consecutive parliamentary elections? I thought it was a matter of principle not appoint losers in elections as ministers since they don't represent the people. So what changes exactly between the first gov or any following one?

I'm truly amazed by the ability of the loyalists to twist everything to suite their goals and agendas.

[hashour]

22:55
النائب احمد فتفت لـ"اخبار المستقبل": عدم توزير الخاسرين عرف دستوري ولم يخرق سابقا ولا مرة عند تشكيل اول حكومة مباشرة بعد الانتخابات النيابية.

Source: LBC

[joseph_lubnan]

it is a fairly typical practice in a parliamentary system with fusion of powers for the PM to select ministers from the elected MPs. This is not only a Lebanese practice.

[lebanese1]

Originally Posted by joseph_lubnan

it is a fairly typical practice in a parliamentary system with fusion of powers for the PM to select ministers from the elected MPs. This is not only a Lebanese practice.

I understand from you that the president won't have any minister?

[joseph_lubnan]

Originally Posted by lebanese1

I understand from you that the president won't have any minister?

Yes he wont have any, unless he has MPs and they happen to be selected by the PM to participate in the gov.

[coralie]

Originally Posted by joseph_lubnan

it is a fairly typical practice in a parliamentary system with fusion of powers for the PM to select ministers from the elected MPs. This is not only a Lebanese practice.

as a start since when a MP should be a minister ??????

if a governement should be formed by MPs then why have a parlement in the first place ? if you know what i mean !!

how come no one opened his mouth when a loser was chosen to be president of the lebanese republic ? (nassib lahoud) it was ok for presidency then but not good enough for ministry today as long as it envolve FPM ?

do you think today the president who lost the wassatiyeh bunch and his own candidates in the last the electoral race should nominate any candidate for the new government ? what is his exact size on popular base ? ohhh yes he is concensual ..... i always tend to forget that sowwyy !

[ohyeah]

Originally Posted by joseph_lubnan

Yes he wont have any, unless he has MPs and they happen to be selected by the PM to participate in the gov.

Unless , except:

Here is Exception Man come again,

Why -joseph_lubnan- all your words contain except meaning?

why u want to invent mew roles?

U support the president and u donot want him to have minster?
U had Nassib Lahod to the presidency and not Jubran whom supported by 27 MP to be minster?

U say all what Kataeb and LF say and U say you aren't one of them?

why all these contradictions,Joseph?

[joseph_lubnan]

Originally Posted by coralie

as a start since when a MP should be a minister ??????

if a governement should be formed by MPs then why have a parlement in the first place ? if you know what i mean !!

Coralie, this is the nature of a parliamentary system, the majority of parliamentary systems have fusion of powers with MPs as ministers, and Lebanon's system is parliamentary.

[joe tayyar]

Originally Posted by ohyeah

Unless , except:

Here is Exception Man come again,

Why -joseph_lubnan- all your words contain except meaning?

why u want to invent mew roles?

U support the president and u donot want him to have minster?
U had Nassib Lahod to the presidency and not Jubran whom supported by 27 MP to be minster?

U say all what Kataeb and LF say and U say you aren't one of them?

why all these contradictions,Joseph?

He is not with them but against FPM allllllllllllll the wayyyyyy.
Even the 14ers leaders are not with each other but against FPM.

[ohyeah]

Originally Posted by joseph_lubnan

Coralie, this is the nature of a parliamentary system, the majority of parliamentary systems have fusion of powers with MPs as ministers, and Lebanon's system is parliamentary.

But the minority have more than 200,000 voters more than the majority.

why man in district can elect 2 members and other one can elect 10 members.

Rules aren't the same Joseph.