advanced search
Contact Us tayyar.org
 
The Orange Room - forum.tayyar.org
 



Notices
The Orange Room Discuss anything related to Lebanon, Lebanese Politics, Breaking News and Live Updates on Major Events related to Lebanon & the World

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  (#91 (permalink)) Old
Orange Room Supporter
 
J. Abizeid's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,627
Thanks: 70
Thanked 502 Times in 247 Posts
Last Online: 7 Hours Ago
Join Date: Wed Aug 2007
View J. Abizeid's Photo Album
Default 28th June 2009



Who’s that Iranian woman next to Saniora?
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to J. Abizeid For This Useful Post:
Bala Habal (30th June 2009), LebanonUSA (30th June 2009), ziadmf (4th July 2009)
Sponsored Links
  (#92 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
Danny Z's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 6,632
Thanks: 167
Thanked 1,189 Times in 794 Posts
Last Online: 1 Day Ago
Join Date: Fri Jun 2005
View Danny Z's Photo Album
Default 30th June 2009

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rising Phoenix View Post

البطريرك صفير: يجب الاهتمام بملف المهجرين


Is batrak threatening Walid Joumblatt in reply to his attack on Samy Gemayel??
What he means is that he needs help on working on tahjir ma tabbaka from the lebanese by his declarations and policies.
Reply With Quote
  (#93 (permalink)) Old
Orange Room Supporter
 
kappa273's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,406
Thanks: 114
Thanked 455 Times in 252 Posts
Last Online: 5 Hours Ago
Join Date: Thu Feb 2005
View kappa273's Photo Album
Default 30th June 2009

jounblatt on june 29th 2009:

«خطابات سامي الجميّل تعيدنا إلى عام 1975. كأنه لا يعلم أن أحداً لم يعتذر في الطائف، وتم تثبيت عروبة لبنان التي حاربها البعض، ومنهم حزب الكتائب»
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kappa273 For This Useful Post:
Bala Habal (30th June 2009), orange infection (30th June 2009)
  (#94 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
Rising Phoenix's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 331
Thanks: 71
Thanked 64 Times in 39 Posts
Last Online: 20 Hours Ago
Join Date: Thu Jun 2006
View Rising Phoenix's Photo Album
Default 30th June 2009

Quote:
Originally Posted by kappa273 View Post
jounblatt on june 29th 2009:

«خطابات سامي الجميّل تعيدنا إلى عام 1975. كأنه لا يعلم أن أحداً لم يعتذر في الطائف، وتم تثبيت عروبة لبنان التي حاربها البعض، ومنهم حزب الكتائب»

البطريرك صفير: يجب الاهتمام بملف المهجرين


Is batrak threatening Walid Joumblatt in reply to his attack on Samy Gemayel??
Reply With Quote
  (#95 (permalink)) Old
Orange Room Supporter
 
Venom's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 9,711
Thanks: 789
Thanked 1,415 Times in 878 Posts
Last Online: 27 Minutes Ago
Join Date: Thu Nov 2006
View Venom's Photo Album
Default 30th June 2009

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rising Phoenix View Post

البطريرك صفير: يجب الاهتمام بملف المهجرين


Is batrak threatening Walid Joumblatt in reply to his attack on Samy Gemayel??
i thought, according to him, the file was closed when he did his comical visit to the shouf in 2001
Reply With Quote
  (#96 (permalink)) Old
Orange Room Supporter
 
Dry Ice's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 9,869
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 1,097
Thanked 1,264 Times in 829 Posts
Last Online: 1 Minute Ago
Join Date: Tue Jul 2005
View Dry Ice's Photo Album
Default 1st July 2009

Makari wants 'realistic' approach to Hizbullah arms

Daily Star staff
Wednesday, July 01, 2009


BEIRUT: Deputy Parliament Speaker Farid Makari said on Tuesday that Hizbullah's weapons arsenal should be tackled "in a realistic manner." "No group is telling the Resistance that it has to disarm, and everybody knows that there have not been any incidents in South Lebanon since UN Security Council Resolution 1701 was issued," he claimed. Makari added that he had no information on whether Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri had offered Hizbullah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah any local, regional or international assurances regarding the Resistance's arms. The deputy speaker said that "logically, the disarmament of the Resistance is impossible, but we should at least know what the future of these arms is."

The Daily Star - Politics - Makari wants 'realistic' approach to Hizbullah arms
Reply With Quote
  (#97 (permalink)) Old
Orange Room Supporter
 
Mich©'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,163
Thanks: 236
Thanked 195 Times in 131 Posts
Last Online: 9 Hours Ago
Join Date: Sat Jan 2007
View Mich©'s Photo Album
Default 1st July 2009

Quote:
Originally Posted by kappa273 View Post
jounblatt on june 29th 2009:

«خطابات سامي الجميّل تعيدنا إلى عام 1975. كأنه لا يعلم أن أحداً لم يعتذر في الطائف، وتم تثبيت عروبة لبنان التي حاربها البعض، ومنهم حزب الكتائب»
Eh bassita boukra bi jewbo:
Ya7ouqo li Walid Jumblat ma la ya7ouqo li ghayrihi!
Reply With Quote
  (#98 (permalink)) Old
Orange Room Supporter
 
Libnene Qu7's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 842
Thanked 428 Times in 238 Posts
Last Online: 1 Hour Ago
Join Date: Mon Aug 2005
View Libnene Qu7's Photo Album
Default 1st July 2009

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dry Ice View Post
Makari wants 'realistic' approach to Hizbullah arms

Daily Star staff
Wednesday, July 01, 2009

BEIRUT: Deputy Parliament Speaker Farid Makari said on Tuesday that Hizbullah's weapons arsenal should be tackled "in a realistic manner." "No group is telling the Resistance that it has to disarm, and everybody knows that there have not been any incidents in South Lebanon since UN Security Council Resolution 1701 was issued," he claimed. Makari added that he had no information on whether Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri had offered Hizbullah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah any local, regional or international assurances regarding the Resistance's arms. The deputy speaker said that "logically, the disarmament of the Resistance is impossible, but we should at least know what the future of these arms is."

The Daily Star - Politics - Makari wants 'realistic' approach to Hizbullah arms
Lebanese politicians are so full of ****, it is getting hard to tell where they start, and where the **** ends.
Reply With Quote
  (#99 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
joseph_lubnan's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,776
Thanks: 118
Thanked 434 Times in 282 Posts
Last Online: 4 Hours Ago
Join Date: Fri Mar 2005
View joseph_lubnan's Photo Album
Default 1st July 2009

Diabolo SLAP or not, this is the reality of the independent voter:

Well before the elections, most independents understood Jumblat's flipfloping and expected as much. Most independents understood that Hezbollah is the de facto military ruler of Lebanon and will not be disarmed by force. Most independents knew very well that Berri will be the speaker. Most independents understood that Hariri won't be the savior, and LF isn't mother Mary. Most didn't expect radical change in the Hezbollah arms situation. And most independents still voted against your blatant support and defense of everything Hezbollah does, your justifications and defense of their weapons and internal incursions, and your political and policy alignment with Iran and Syria. Had the opposition won, Hezbollah would have been entirely at the helm. The Syrian Iranian policy would have been entirely uncontested. And it was clear to the voter that you had already agreed to that.

The loyalists aren't a savory bunch, but they were the only available alternative to the voter. How they move forward on the issue of Hezbollah's weapons and control of the country, however weak it may be, it will always remain a notch lower than the complete capitulation that FPM exhibited. One has to remember that Hezbollah practically rules Lebanon already militarily, and that the government in all its functions is and will be under duress. My preference remains as it always had been the political isolation of Hezbollah, and not necessarily taking reckless military action against Hezbollah as you like to claim. I never expected Saad Hariri to do that and he is not, but what was the alternative? voting for Hezbollah!!? Believe me I will be criticizing the new government's approach to Hezbollah's weapons, but that doesn't mean that one should regret the results of the elections, for a win by the opposition would have been significantly worse on this particular issue, and it would have put Hezbollah and its regional sponsors politicaly at the helm, more than they already are by the power of their gun.
Reply With Quote
  (#100 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
Armenian's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 1,017
Thanks: 299
Thanked 678 Times in 312 Posts
Last Online: 2 Hours Ago
Join Date: Tue Feb 2009
View Armenian's Photo Album
Default 1st July 2009

Quote:
Originally Posted by joseph_lubnan View Post
Diabolo SLAP or not, this is the reality of the independent voter:

Well before the elections, most independents understood Jumblat's flipfloping and expected as much. Most independents understood that Hezbollah is the de facto military ruler of Lebanon and will not be disarmed by force. Most independents knew very well that Berri will be the speaker. Most independents understood that Hariri won't be the savior, and LF isn't mother Mary. Most didn't expect radical change in the Hezbollah arms situation. And most independents still voted against your blatant support and defense of everything Hezbollah does, your justifications and defense of their weapons and internal incursions, and your political and policy alignment with Iran and Syria. Had the opposition won, Hezbollah would have been entirely at the helm. The Syrian Iranian policy would have been entirely uncontested. And it was clear to the voter that you had already agreed to that.

The loyalists aren't a savory bunch, but they were the only available alternative to the voter. How they move forward on the issue of Hezbollah's weapons and control of the country, however weak it may be, it will always remain a notch lower than the complete capitulation that FPM exhibited. One has to remember that Hezbollah practically rules Lebanon already militarily, and that the government in all its functions is and will be under duress. My preference remains as it always had been the political isolation of Hezbollah, and not necessarily taking reckless military action against Hezbollah as you like to claim. I never expected Saad Hariri to do that and he is not, but what was the alternative? voting for Hezbollah!!? Believe me I will be criticizing the new government's approach to Hezbollah's weapons, but that doesn't mean that one should regret the results of the elections, for a win by the opposition would have been significantly worse on this particular issue, and it would have put Hezbollah and its regional sponsors politicaly at the helm, more than they already are by the power of their gun.
With all due respect Joseph, I have to desagree on the part in red...

Please take one minute of your time and visit some loyalist forums and you will understand that not the independents only but LFers and FMers were expecting a big change concerning the Hezbollah arms and concerning Berri as being speaker and as Hariri being the savour...

If the party partisans were expecting that, then the independents were also...

I will agree on the part that you said that they were afraid of HA arms and the Iranian influence and that's why they voted to M14... They didn't vote for M14 because of programs or political ideologies and the biggest example is you...

Thank you!!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Armenian For This Useful Post:
CitizenOfTheRepublic (1st July 2009), ziadmf (4th July 2009)
Reply

  The Orange Room - forum.tayyar.org The Orange Room Main Forums The Orange Room

Tags
assad, meets, reality, siniora, slap


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Forums Directory