 | | | Registered Member
Online Posts: 734 Thanks: 15
Thanked 149 Times in 92 Posts
Last Online: 1 Hour Ago Join Date: Sun Mar 2007 | 
24th October 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fakhr eddine 1618 If he is planning to have a kitleh wataniyyeh form all regions and sects, then you may come and tell me "what's wrong with it"?
However, having an objective to come and reduce the power of only one team, this won't be consencus anymore
Why doesn't he support my political ambitions if it does not differ. At least, everybody knows who we are and form where we got our strength. As for him, I still didn't know how he convinced US, Syria, Saudi and Egypt to become President that he is their man | It is any lebanese citizens' right to form a political party.
If gms wishes to maximise on his position of influence as a former general and curent president, good luck to him, others before him have done so, including gma.
it is the people who ultimately decide who represents them in parliament , not gms, gma, harriri, geagea, or jumbi | | | | | Registered Member
Online Posts: 1,113 Thanks: 366
Thanked 424 Times in 276 Posts
Last Online: 4 Minutes Ago Join Date: Wed Jun 2007 | 
24th October 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanfour a parliamentary block at equal distance from all.  | Securing and running a parliamentary block at equal distance from all is useless.
It may become interesting if it manages to create bridges between the other political blocks in the interest of the country.
This can not be achieved but by a person who has the stature of former president Chehab.
With all due respect, President Sleimane has not the stature of Chehab... | | | | | Orange Room Supporter
Online Posts: 3,188 Thanks: 891
Thanked 775 Times in 327 Posts
Last Online: 1 Hour Ago Join Date: Fri May 2005 | 
24th October 2008
Because Michel Sleiman is a consensual president who seems to need a "national" parliamentary bloc,
it'd be fair if he proposes one candidate in every single electoral district in Lebanon.
He'd gather a "patriotic" bloc that counts more than 20 MPs. | | | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 9,034 Thanks: 275
Thanked 582 Times in 416 Posts
Last Online: 3 Days Ago Join Date: Thu Apr 2005 | 
24th October 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Davis It is any lebanese citizens' right to form a political party.
If gms wishes to maximise on his position of influence as a former general and curent president, good luck to him, others before him have done so, including gma.
it is the people who ultimately decide who represents them in parliament , not gms, gma, harriri, geagea, or jumbi | Michel Soleiman is NOT any lebanese citizen he is the LEBANESE PRESIDENT . can you see the difference ?
If GMS want to maximise on his position and work to have more influence let him start gaining back his presidential SALA7IYET first . let him do it as a president who has real powers not by playing small forming palementary blocks like any parti leader for GOD sake he is the president let him act based on that .
the people choose their MPs the MPs choose the PRESIDENT who is suppose to be for all not take part in the game to "insure" his position or increase his powers . His powers should be protected and given by the constitution unfortunatly after Taef his powers are reduced to nearely nothing . | | | | | Orange Room Moderator
Offline Posts: 4,779 Thanks: 815
Thanked 818 Times in 503 Posts
Last Online: 10 Hours Ago Join Date: Mon Sep 2004 | 
24th October 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanfour this is becoming ridiculous, cursing anyone who is not sitting in GMA's lap
will not help. and accusing your president of being a Saudi puppet without
any proof just because there may be some candidates who will support
him, will not help either. why then do you blame people for accusing
Aoun of being an Iranian puppet? | He He if this you call cursing, you didn't see anything yet. Noone is asking for GMS to sit in GMA's lap, but we don't want him to sit in anybody else's lap too.
President Slayman was not elected as president because he has popular support, President Slayman was elected because he was supposedly a neutral and at the same distance from everyone.
I don't care what people accuse GMA, I am with freedom of speach and people can take any position they like as far as I am concerned.
But President Slayman was where he was in the last 10 years due to the syrians only, and now if he wants to join the bandwagon of Hariri, it will be logical for us to deduce that he changed his syrian horse to a saudi one, no?Unless you don't believe that hariri is a saudi puppet, then we have a big problem here. | | | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 9,034 Thanks: 275
Thanked 582 Times in 416 Posts
Last Online: 3 Days Ago Join Date: Thu Apr 2005 | 
24th October 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanfour a parliamentary block at equal distance from all.  | yeah right !!!!!!!!!!!!!
seems you missed the part in my post saying i dont believe there is something called neutral !  | | | | | Orange Room Supporter
Offline Posts: 8,979 Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,526 Times in 852 Posts
Last Online: 10 Hours Ago Join Date: Fri Dec 2005 | 
24th October 2008
Guys guys relax. Let Sleiman run his own lists, so what. If you think there are neutral people today in Lebanon, you'd be completely naive. The people who today will vote for FPM, will vote for FPM no matter who is facing FPM, same goes for LF, Kataeb... Sleiman's "independent" candidates will be for example Michel Murr. MM will get the votes that belong to him, whether he is with FPM or Kataeb or backed by president. Same goes to the other candidates like Khoury, Hawat or anyone who will be udner the President's wing.
I would love to see Sleiman backing candidates actually, it will be 3assfourein bi hajar for us, not only rendering the 14 feb losers more meaningless than what they are now, but also, Sleiman will know his REAL value and size, ou khalle kell wahad ya3rif hajmo. | | | | | Registered Member
Online Posts: 3,355 Thanks: 78
Thanked 425 Times in 284 Posts
Last Online: 2 Hours Ago Join Date: Fri Jun 2005 | 
24th October 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by coralie yeah right !!!!!!!!!!!!!
seems you missed the part in my post saying i dont believe there is something called neutral !  | i didn't miss it, coralie. what the president meant is neither 8 march
nor 14 march and that does not necessarily mean neutral. it is something
similar to what president Fouad Chehab did back in the 60s.
anyway, that's not the worst case scenario.....the worst case scenario
is if the votes are split between him and the FPM lists so that neither
of them can win and the 14 Feb. vote in one block for their lists and win. | | | | | Registered Member
Online Posts: 2,389 Thanks: 1,691
Thanked 306 Times in 225 Posts
Last Online: 42 Minutes Ago Join Date: Sat Dec 2007 | 
24th October 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by barid And why is that?  | till now , i haven't heard of any list for the president in bsharri , or akkar , or chouf or aley
what a coincidence , gms's lists do not appear where the christian opposition will lose | | | | | Registered Member
Online Posts: 3,355 Thanks: 78
Thanked 425 Times in 284 Posts
Last Online: 2 Hours Ago Join Date: Fri Jun 2005 | 
24th October 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange infection till now , i haven't heard of any list for the president in bsharri , or akkar , or chouf or aley
what a coincidence , gms's lists do not appear where the christian opposition will lose | personally, i didn't hear of any GMS lists anywhere yet. | | | |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |