No Peace with Israel, No For Hezbollah Arms, Yes for the Naturalization

[Robin Hood]

Originally Posted by theMightyRedV

^ Saladin, what the Syrians choose to do is their decision - their choice.

Just like it's the Iraqi's choice to either resist, or accept foreign troops.

For HezbAllah, direct negotiations with "israel" bears no fruit. Take a look at all the BS peace accords that are signed on "israeli" terms. Papers that aren't worth neshe7. If any nation believes signing a peace accord with "israel" will serve them, the Arabs, and indeed the Muslims - that's their choice. HezbAllah will continue reclaiming the rights of their people the only way they know to - which is true justice.

In 2006 he was like a besseh under the table cornering HezbAllah to disarm in return for an end to the war. In May, Hariri and co. wanted to disarm HezbAllah without any strategy, inciting the same level of fitneh as the Americans do in Iraq. Halla2 baddo yjeeb a few mig fighters wu baddo ye3mel 7aalo Lebanon's saviour? After all the money he spilt to incite religious hatred wiy bayyed tnejir?

Let mur jnr jemel bi saksooktak ya sa3doun, el rjel byen3erfo byowm el sheddeh!

The Butcher of Beirut, Ariel Sharon, said in May 2005 that all agreements signed with the Arabs do not worth the paper used to write them. In other term, I doubt Israel wants genuine peace, they only want the Arabs to surrender to them.

[vegojimbo]

Originally Posted by Saladin

You mean with their contradictions?

And here we thought the 2 are one since ur side has been hounding for 2 years that GMA became a puppet to HA.

Originally Posted by Greg Davis

Not defending the guy, but, assume he did say ' we call for negotiations with Israel', wouldn't everyone here call him a traitor'.

GMA actually did, what a traitor!

[Xguy]

The sad truth that this guy's priorities are very screwd up, for him, the demise of his opponents is more important then the prosperity and safety of Lebanon,
he knows very well if Israel wants to strike a deal with Syria (without lebanon's involvment) , it is not for the purpose of peace, it's for the purpose of weakning Hizbollah, therefore securing it's northern borders, it's borders with Syria have been fine for a while, and he knows Israel's number one condition for peace with Syria, is isolating Iran and hizbollah, therefore serving his agenda.
It is in our benefit to be involved in those negotiation, Syria should not be negotiating with Israel alone,
A deal between Syria and Israel alone would mean the destruction of Lebanon period.

[Bejin]

Dr. Fouad Abou Nader thinks that friendly relations with both Syria and Israel will maybe not start in the near future “but definitely in the end we have to find a resolution. Why can’t we achieve peace between our countries? Our peace has to be fair between the Israelis and us and between Syria and us as well.”

[elhakeem2jours]

Originally Posted by Venom

Saad is against direct negotiations with Israel because GMA proposed it .....That's the whole issue about it.

sheikh saad may want more time and hostility with israel and hopefully win elections so they can draft a law with a special clause that would allow tens of thousands of palestinian sunnites to be eligable and cash in on lebanese citizenship to counterfeit the shiite threat....

aside from that, he has nothing to care about. remember, he is a saudi man.

with all due respect to him, he has done some good things too, but now he is scared of the shiite demographic threat and shiite political threat to the sunni empire. for this, i dont care about, i care only about my cause and one of my causes is for the palestinians to leave.......in this case, i trust the hizb...