Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Strider Thank You, great question. plus i loved how he told me i have to live with it. well to tell the truth i dont have to live with anything,if something needs to be corrected i truelly dont have to live with it especially if we think of lebanon as a democratic country. No my friend i don't have to live with Murr and i refuse to say he represents anything let alone the orthodox... |
Strider, for a metniote you do not seem to know much about the metn. Regardless of my views of Michel el Murr, I have to say that he has built a huge network of popular support through hiw "Khadamet".
He might have been corrupt or not that is not the point. He might represent you or not; but that is not the point. He certainly has a lot of followers in Matn, his people have won numerous Baladiyet; and to be fair, it isn't the moujannassin who allowed him to become a deputy.
He probably even has more support than what the Gemayel family has left.
Now coming back to the Myrna vs Gaby issue; it is certain that through an FPM/LF alliance, Myrna would strictly gather her father's supporters votes. Taking that into consideration, don't you think that Myrna got quite a few votes, or do you still believe that Michel el Murr represents no one but himself? It is not because you do not think he represents you that he doesn't represent anyone.
Now to answer the main question, as someone stated, there should be ongoing discussions between the three parties that are the most representative. Ya3ne, LF+PSP+FM agree on the issues to be discussed and send one representatve; GMA & allies (Skaff, Murr...) send one of their own and Hezb/Amal a third one.
If I had o go with one of the two, I'd say Murr because he simply represents more people on the ground.