Makery V/S Murr

[MZALAT]

Farid Makery asked Bery :

ماذا لو اقترح في مؤتمر وطني على اساس التمثيل الطائفي ان يمثل النائب الزميل عباس هاشم الطائفة الشيعية في هذا المؤتمر؟

An Michel el Murr said :

حصلت على اعلى نسبة من الاصوات لارثوذكس

So what do you think is more important : The official post ( Neyib Ra2is Majlis Neweb for Farid Makery ) OR the grade of representing the sect ( Majority of Orthodox voted Michel el Murr In Meten ) ? ? ?

[Dry Ice]

Originally Posted by MZALAT

Farid Makery asked Bery :

ماذا لو اقترح في مؤتمر وطني على اساس التمثيل الطائفي ان يمثل النائب الزميل عباس هاشم الطائفة الشيعية في هذا المؤتمر؟

An Michel el Murr said :

حصلت على اعلى نسبة من الاصوات لارثوذكس

So what do you think is more important : The official post ( Neyib Ra2is Majlis Neweb for Farid Makery ) OR the grade of representing the sect ( Majority of Orthodox voted Michel el Murr In Meten ) ? ? ?

How about honesty and lack of corruption?

[MZALAT]

Originally Posted by Dry Ice

How about honesty and lack of corruption?

Soooo befham menak eno u want Makery on the dialogue table ? ? ?

[IAN VAN DAHL]

Murr represent important section of people.The number of votes show so.

Yes he deserve to be there.He represents me.
Others are just taba3iyeh to hariri and are crying.I am happy to see them like that

[CedarLb]

Originally Posted by Dry Ice

How about honesty and lack of corruption?

Had it been the case, the dialogue would be restricted to few leaders. What do you think?

[IAN VAN DAHL]

To say Murr is corrupted is really not right.

This man been helping armenians a lot.This man for many many years still has the support of more then 95% of armenians.

He always wins in maten in armenian votes.He is great person.

He deserves to be in there.He has backing of 95% of armenian orthodox.

[Kolar]

Originally Posted by MZALAT

Farid Makery asked Bery :

ماذا لو اقترح في مؤتمر وطني على اساس التمثيل الطائفي ان يمثل النائب الزميل عباس هاشم الطائفة الشيعية في هذا المؤتمر؟

An Michel el Murr said :

حصلت على اعلى نسبة من الاصوات لارثوذكس

So what do you think is more important : The official post ( Neyib Ra2is Majlis Neweb for Farid Makery ) OR the grade of representing the sect ( Majority of Orthodox voted Michel el Murr In Meten ) ? ? ?

well it is quite logic:

1 - This meeting well be held to assure more effectiveness between all parties and to agree on a common point / points.
2 - this is not a game we are dealing with "saving a whole country"
3 - and to take such big decision u should take into consideration the lebanese as overall (because u cant satisfy everyone) and what they are looking for - - isn't it "loubnan 2awalan...wa 2akhiran" ?!
4 - Mr Makari we all know how he got this official post (metel ma sar bel ta3yinet)
5 - MP Michel l Murr took the majority of the Orthodox's votes so a big portion of the lebanese (especially orthodox) are supporting him.

As conclusion akid it's more important to take the one with the majority of voices

[MZALAT]

Originally Posted by CedarLb

Had it been the case, the dialogue would be restricted to few leaders. What do you think?

If u want my opinion, ana i would restrict it to :GMA , HASSAN NASRALA , SA3D HARIRI , WALID JONBLAT W BERRY(yimkin).......no need for sects representeter or a representeter of ba3th & kawme soury....

[a3ntar]

Originally Posted by Dry Ice

How about honesty and lack of corruption?

In this case, we would see only GMA and SHN on the 7iwar table !

[IAN VAN DAHL]

If u want the truth.
They must restrict to three people only.
One representitive of hizbollah and berri.
second of harir/junblatt/kouwet
third GMA and his allies.


And if its not on political thinking diferences the dialogue rather religion.

then let the religous people of each taifi send his representitive in there.
Like Roum Orthodox mtran elias 3awdeh
Maronites patriarch sfeir.
Bla bla.