Quote:
Originally Posted by Dry Ice Because the Syrian regime isn't interested in a strong and competitive Lebanon, rather one that is subject to its political sphere of influence - its past performance in terms of violent acts lends further credence to that particular point.
New stuff for you, eh ^ |
blowing stuff up after syria withdrew from lebanon is not in its interest unless u think u are worth the bombs they using on us. like this is a drama movie or such..
rather, blowing up stuff after syria left lebanon and turning lebanon into a complete anti-syrian state that cannot support hizbullah is in the neo-cons and the israelis' complete interest. that would double the syrian loss in their eyes.
time flows chronologically, we cannot remain stuck with old rhetoric like a broken vinyl record.
it is so normal now to accuse syria of bombings since 2005 while it's taboo to even mention the fact that our country is festering with salafist trash?, now that's something new for me..
the same ppl who are accusing syria now blindly were the same exact ppl that were accusing israel blindly from 1990-2005.
valid logic is rare commodity in this country it seems.
especially for vehement "believers" in accusations and not evidence.
long live the medieval ages again i say..