 | | | Orange Room Supporter
Offline Posts: 8,979 Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,526 Times in 852 Posts
Last Online: 10 Hours Ago Join Date: Fri Dec 2005 | 
2nd June 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny Z Sorry not that i don't believe the FPM story, but we can't see anything in this video | No need to see, just listen. The guy said one shot was done bel ghalat, what did you hear, one shot? If so, then the guy is not lying, if you heard more than one shot, then it was not by mistake and thus, the soldiers who were shot at were shot at ON PURPOSE MECH BEL GHALAT. I'll leave it to you to deduce what this means and what it entails, shooting at soldiers. | | | | | The Following User Says Thank You to Youchka For This Useful Post: | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 6,632 Thanks: 167
Thanked 1,189 Times in 794 Posts
Last Online: 3 Days Ago Join Date: Fri Jun 2005 | 
2nd June 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Youchka No need to see, just listen. The guy said one shot was done bel ghalat, what did you hear, one shot? If so, then the guy is not lying, if you heard more than one shot, then it was not by mistake and thus, the soldiers who were shot at were shot at ON PURPOSE MECH BEL GHALAT. I'll leave it to you to deduce what this means and what it entails, shooting at soldiers. | It could be the army shooting in the air, the video doesn't show anything at all. | | | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 57 Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Last Online: 4th July 2009 Join Date: Fri May 2005 | 
2nd June 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Youchka No need to see, just listen. The guy said one shot was done bel ghalat, what did you hear, one shot? If so, then the guy is not lying, if you heard more than one shot, then it was not by mistake and thus, the soldiers who were shot at were shot at ON PURPOSE MECH BEL GHALAT. I'll leave it to you to deduce what this means and what it entails, shooting at soldiers. |
Yes we can listen !!! You dont need to be a military expert to know that the shots you heard came from an automatic rifle. No one questioned or arrrested in the incident had any automatic weapon. One unregistered handgun was confiscated by the army. The only side on the scene with automatic weaponery was the army. The Army fired in the air to disperse the crowds and break the fights.
Whether it was an accidental discharging or not, its not you that determines this. The military and the inestigation will! Unless you were on the scene and saw in your own eyes what happened, and if you did i am sure you should be more then delighted to present yourself as an eyewitness. | | | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 1,027 Thanks: 268
Thanked 224 Times in 165 Posts
Last Online: 10 Hours Ago Join Date: Fri Nov 2005 | 
2nd June 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mafiose13 Yes we can listen !!! You dont need to be a military expert to know that the shots you heard came from an automatic rifle. No one questioned or arrrested in the incident had any automatic weapon. One unregistered handgun was confiscated by the army. The only side on the scene with automatic weaponery was the army. The Army fired in the air to disperse the crowds and break the fights.
Whether it was an accidental discharging or not, its not you that determines this. The military and the inestigation will! Unless you were on the scene and saw in your own eyes what happened, and if you did i am sure you should be more then delighted to present yourself as an eyewitness. | While it isn't clear from the video who fired how many shots, one thing is crystal clear: Nawfal's man had a drawn weapon in the face of unarmed students and Lebanese army soldiers. That can be said without a doubt, and that's bad enough.
Cheers! | | | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 57 Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Last Online: 4th July 2009 Join Date: Fri May 2005 | 
2nd June 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by General my General! While it isn't clear from the video who fired how many shots, one thing is crystal clear: Nawfal's man had a drawn weapon in the face of unarmed students and Lebanese army soldiers. That can be said without a doubt, and that's bad enough.
Cheers! | I understand, but to me "Crystal Clear" = a judicial ruling or military court ruling. So mate any side can claim things. What is crystal clear is that sar fi mashkal, a shot was fired, there were wounded. No fight starts without a reason, and no fight continues if people dont feed it. Followers (and i hate this word), supporters...from all sides should be a lot more responsible and a lot more tolerant and accepting of the other.
Another crystal clear for me is we need to learn as lebanese enno nkhafif na2lel 7akeh wel isha3et and blowing things out of proportion, distorting public opinion for our own sake. (that goes for all sides). | | | | | The Following User Says Thank You to mafiose13 For This Useful Post: | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 6,632 Thanks: 167
Thanked 1,189 Times in 794 Posts
Last Online: 3 Days Ago Join Date: Fri Jun 2005 | 
2nd June 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mafiose13 I understand, but to me "Crystal Clear" = a judicial ruling or military court ruling. So mate any side can claim things. What is crystal clear is that sar fi mashkal, a shot was fired, there were wounded. No fight starts without a reason, and no fight continues if people dont feed it. Followers (and i hate this word), supporters...from all sides should be a lot more responsible and a lot more tolerant and accepting of the other.
Another crystal clear for me is we need to learn as lebanese enno nkhafif na2lel 7akeh wel isha3et and blowing things out of proportion, distorting public opinion for our own sake. (that goes for all sides). | There won't be a court ruling and you know that because el kada2 bi 2idkon, if it was something that FPM started and was responsible for it, it would have been immediately sanctioned by the kada2 but since el zo3ran who have the law taken as a hostage are the same who are attacking people then nothing will happen before you leave power and it is coming.
Care to explain to us why Frem was released and you are still talking about judiciary? | | | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 153 Thanks: 183
Thanked 48 Times in 29 Posts
Last Online: 7 Hours Ago Join Date: Mon Sep 2006 | 
2nd June 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mafiose13 I understand, but to me "Crystal Clear" = a judicial ruling or military court ruling. So mate any side can claim things. What is crystal clear is that sar fi mashkal, a shot was fired, there were wounded. No fight starts without a reason, and no fight continues if people dont feed it. Followers (and i hate this word), supporters...from all sides should be a lot more responsible and a lot more tolerant and accepting of the other.
Another crystal clear for me is we need to learn as lebanese enno nkhafif na2lel 7akeh wel isha3et and blowing things out of proportion, distorting public opinion for our own sake. (that goes for all sides). | Blowing things out of proportion....!!!????? two soldiers ended up in the hospital... you who resides in the United States care to explain to me what would have happened if the bodyguard of a candidate for the elections shot and wounded two police officers regardless if it was premeditated or not...I bet it would've been all over the news and the candidate would have aplogized for the wounded officers...If my hearing serves me well he not only did not apologize but he kept on spilling his hatred.... Quel Culot!!!!! | | | | | Registered Member
Online Posts: 6,578 Thanks: 690
Thanked 723 Times in 383 Posts
Last Online: 21 Minutes Ago Join Date: Sun Apr 2005 | 
2nd June 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny Z It could be the army shooting in the air, the video doesn't show anything at all. | then how come two army men were shot? and both in their legs? | | | | | Orange Room Supporter
Offline Posts: 3,877 Thanks: 303
Thanked 1,240 Times in 620 Posts
Last Online: 2 Days Ago Join Date: Tue Jun 2006 | 
2nd June 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mafiose13 Yes we can listen !!! You dont need to be a military expert to know that the shots you heard came from an automatic rifle. No one questioned or arrrested in the incident had any automatic weapon. One unregistered handgun was confiscated by the army. The only side on the scene with automatic weaponery was the army. The Army fired in the air to disperse the crowds and break the fights.
Whether it was an accidental discharging or not, its not you that determines this. The military and the inestigation will! Unless you were on the scene and saw in your own eyes what happened, and if you did i am sure you should be more then delighted to present yourself as an eyewitness. | this must be one enchanted bullet this bodyguard managed to fire; wounding 1 officer, 1 army solider, and 2 FPM supporters. maybe he buys his amo from the same store as silvester stalone, AKA R.A.M.B.O. | | | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 57 Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Last Online: 4th July 2009 Join Date: Fri May 2005 | 
2nd June 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny Z There won't be a court ruling and you know that because el kada2 bi 2idkon, if it was something that FPM started and was responsible for it, it would have been immediately sanctioned by the kada2 but since el zo3ran who have the law taken as a hostage are the same who are attacking people then nothing will happen before you leave power and it is coming.
Care to explain to us why Frem was released and you are still talking about judiciary? | You are funny dude!
Who do you think is taking the kada2 hostage?! Emile Nawfal walla the iron fist Joseph Makhoul (the "accidental" shooter).
So now la Ziad Baroud sar yeswa, wala professor Najjar sar yeswa. ya 7aram 3al 3alam wein ra7ya.
Now I understand why you were chearing for the release of jamil el Sayid, obviously he and Addoum represent to you la creme de la creme in Honesty, qualifications, humility and humanism ?!
"kama takounoun youwalla 3alaykoum" maybe you deserve these idols to be brought back. But you bring them back....and we will bring them down again. I promise!
(and when i saw ...."we" i mean the people not a specific political party, because i dont represent anyone here) | | | |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |