Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fidelio If these politicians don't take matters in their own hands and settle things peacefully like what happened in Lassa, they are definitely not to be blamed. Especially when some parasites like State-builder-Soueid is instigating people against each other; something which could lead to civil unrest. |
1- Why would politicians be able to settle things the judicature wasn't able to settle? Is it because conflicting parties would abide by political leaders decisions but not by the court's decisions? And are these politicians investing on this fact to malignantly increase their influence?
2- Do you have any concrete information about this specific case?
2- What if in cases that are of public or general interest, conflicting parties or groups (a minority or a majority of them) do not all agree on a settlement concluded by non official parties? What if it's the case now?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fidelio Because of the way he is treating the media. He lubricated the justice mechanism during the judicial holiday just to speed Rizk's case against NTV. And frankly, the fact that NTV alone is to be closed, negates the term "justice". This is one aspect of his lousiness. |
So you're basically judging all his behavior based on the NTV issue. Now regarding this case, I agree that no verdict against any media station should reach closure or even suspension. But actually, the whole procedures of the court of publications should probably be reviewed and amended to set a top limit for measures that could be taken against media stations. Why are you putting the blame on the minister?