Quote:
Originally Posted by John A FPM is not demanding for powerful rights for christian because it's a christian party, FPM is working to save the equality between the sects in Lebanon. Once a sect is not given its rights, Lebanon will be gone. Let's not fool ourselves, we can preach day and night about secularism, and we'll probably achieve a progress, only when all sects have equal rights. |
What are those rights that a sect must have in order for Lebanon to be ungone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by John A You cannot ask for secularism if this sect or that one's rights are undertaken by another one. That's not possible. I can't convince a lebanese citizen to follow a secular system if that system won't give him his rights. If the state and the law deal with citizens as class A and class B ones, no one will accept it. |
Could you give a practical example away from the welfare state employment?
Granted, many positions are provided on a sectarian basis but what is the percentage of state employees vs total workforce + many leaders of the sectarian system provide wastas for citizens from different sects... it's about clientelism, however most sects if not all are practicing it, so where are the forgone rights?
Please state specific examples so we could discuss.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John A Many pro-fpmers were criticizing FPM and GMA's speech and accused it of being sectarian, but FPM is trying to build a nation, taking into consideration the lebanese system and society. FPM's policy and charter are clear, but no one can expect to achieve what's in it in an easy way. We cannot hide behind our fingers (like the communist party for example) and talk about secularism, while we forget that the system is malfunctioning. |
How much progress did the "hybrid" policy of FPM achieve so far?
There should be backup plans. If you think that many people think of sectarian rights, you should also be aware that many others do not.
What is the use of FPM's popularity if it is based on sectarian chest beating?
In what is FPM better or different from the communist party in terms of actual secular achievements? You are concerned of becoming like the communist party however your secular achievements are practically the same: very little if anything.
FPM is a theory and will remain a theory unless it starts working on the ground to change people's minds towards a secular state, if you think that is impossible within a sectarian system then you should not be a partisan in the first place... in other words, in what are you - a partisan - better than the average joe in terms of promoting secularism?