Quote:
Originally Posted by spacecreature I didn't see anything wrong with the ad where the man is holding a finger against his head. It wanted to transmit a message against FPM and it did it with a small clever twist, so what. You don't have to agree but it's their right, I didnt c any breach of laws there.
What shocked me the most was the videos of armed men (symbolizing the mou3arada) entering a happy home and terrorizing the family. That's a very strong image. And they were filmed professionally so I don't think it's just intended for closed groups on the internet. But we haven't seen any of them yet on TV. Maybe they are waiting for the last few days for a greater effect? |
the prob is that it is directly attacking another party claiming that the partisans of such a party are suicidal.
it's like putting the image of a guy in a blue shirt and typing under him 'IDIOT' and distributing it as electoral material.
the fact that they are less/more subtle about it makes little difference that is it insulting other partisans hence instigating strife somewhere.
that the whole darn point, not how cute and smart their designer is.
if there is no law governing this, then let me put a subtle image of a guy in a blue shirt making a hand gesture as if he is playing with himself and put no caption under it....
the limit is drawn when u insult others in ur ads hence risking social strife.
we are talking about official published electoral material here, not online ta2 7anak like we have everywhere.