Quote:
Originally Posted by X I will vote for the whole opposition list without looking at the names, so SSNP as a political party (leadership) should not worry or even think about if FPMers are shy or not, in the areas that they have followers, they should work 200% to make sure all their followers participate in the elections and vote for the whole opposition list.
Now about SSNPers and FPMers being shy from each others, that's completely irrelevant here, and by the way, about the alliance, it's not about FPMers, its not about the supporters, its the decision of the leadership and if the leadership of FPM decided to ally with SSNP and any FPMer didn't vote for the SSNP on the list is actually betraying FPM. Not voting for the SSNP (in case they were on our list) means one voice went to our opponents and that one voice can switch the majority from one side to another. |
X,
FPM leadership then should understand the nature of its support base and not put them in such an awkward postion; especially when it is not validated. the leadership has to balance out how many voices it can win versus how many it stand sto lose, from the looks of it, it doesn't require a genius to figure it out.
we may lose a certain percentage of SSNP voters if we do not form an alliance, but at the end of the day, the majority of SSNP supporters will be voting FPM with or without an alliance, because the alternative to them is very pricy.
what i cant understand, is why are you guys still contemplating the issue? even though one of the paths you are contemplating bye7ru2 el tayyar in so many kazaas.