 | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 149 Thanks: 20
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Last Online: 28th July 2009 Join Date: Tue Apr 2008 | 
8th July 2008
I wouldn't say "If you go MAC, you never go back". It depends more on what you need.
If you're working with graphics (whether you are a designer or a CG guy), you might prefer Apple products over Microsoft's. And if you're an IT guy or developer you might prefer Linux over MAC OS and Windows. If you're an end user that hardly uses anything beside Microsoft Office applications you might prefer Windows. Beside, with Apple having Intel inside components, you can have both MAC OS & Windows on the same computer (and even Linux).
So which one is better is defined by your need.
I call Apple products "Pretty Boy": They're pretty but don't actually satisfy my needs (I prefer girls  ).
If you want to talk about statistics, a lot of companies are switching to MAC since it requires little IT monitoring especially when it gets to viruses and spywares. And the ones sticking with Microsoft technology didn't upgrade to Windows Vista and most of those buying new computers are downgrading back to Windows XP. | | | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 2,480 Thanks: 94
Thanked 213 Times in 127 Posts
Last Online: 3 Weeks Ago Join Date: Tue May 2004 | 
8th July 2008
I hate this Mac vs. PC debate, because each has some strong points and some weak points.
I have an iMac, one thing that annoys me with it is when it crashes, it crashes, and there's no possibility of recovery. I don't know about the newer technologies so I will not judge on the newer designs. The Mac is very strong in graphics and even in sound recording, I really enjoyed that part of it. It is safer than the PC in terms of security.
The PC is more open ended, you are able to hook it up to 1 million things more than a Mac, the Mac seems to be more or less "if you want to add stuff, it has to be a Mac product" with the iLife concept. The PC presents the widest variety of compatibility to softwares, and it's this open ended concept that makes it more vulnerable, so it's a two sided blade. | | | | | Orange Room Supporter
Offline Posts: 4,067 Thanks: 900
Thanked 1,744 Times in 859 Posts
Last Online: 2 Days Ago Join Date: Wed Apr 2007 | 
8th July 2008
actually i think mirosoft mac products are way better than Microsoft windows products. just check mirosoft office on both systems. | | | | | Orange Room Moderator
Online Posts: 696 Thanks: 91
Thanked 190 Times in 149 Posts
Last Online: 2 Hours Ago Join Date: Wed Dec 2005 | 
8th July 2008
It depends on the user.
I personally prefer a PC over a Mac.
A PC is more reliable and more friendly user. My laptop runs on Windows Vista business edition and it never gave me any problems. I have a load of engineering softwares from Matlab to Solidworks and they run perfect.
On the other hand, a Mac is a more colorful tool with its powerful graphics.
As far as security and viruses, eventually Mac will be targeted as much as a PC. | | | | | Orange Room Supporter
Offline Posts: 1,991 Thanks: 842
Thanked 428 Times in 238 Posts
Last Online: 2 Days Ago Join Date: Mon Aug 2005 | 
9th July 2008
Why are MACs so weak in gaming? I know they're a more superior and stable platform than PC, but their gaming industry is weak. Otherwise, I would have switched ages ago. | | | | | Orange Room Supporter
Offline Posts: 4,067 Thanks: 900
Thanked 1,744 Times in 859 Posts
Last Online: 2 Days Ago Join Date: Wed Apr 2007 | 
9th July 2008
I only play fifa nba and need for speed on the computer every now and then and graphics seemed good (to me at least). | | | | | Registered Member
Online Posts: 220 Thanks: 14
Thanked 71 Times in 36 Posts
Last Online: 10 Minutes Ago Join Date: Sat Mar 2008 | 
12th July 2008
mac security is a myth, mac OSX is not more secure, but the size of mac virus population is less than 1% that of windows, and hackers look for impact
it's far more satisfying and lucrative to target a 75%+market share than a 2% marketshare
macs suck at gaming simply because games are not natively written for mac, and most gaming companies do not spend the costs required to develop games for such a small marketshare
Apple charges a premium just for design and name, spec for spec a macbook or macbook pro is always around 25% more expensive than a comparable laptop
apple is even more proprietary and self centered than microsoft, they drastically limit your upgrade choices, between ilife, itunes, quicktime, safari... etc and force to stay on the apple orbit
mac OSX is now almost 7 years old, the 5 updates are nothing more than "fancy" service packs, each costing $125
macs are now no more special from a hardware point of view, they run on very similar if not identical hardware than all other PC's, one could have argumented in the past in favor of the power PC processors, but why should i pay more just for design and OS?
ever notice how in their marketing ever single new mac is about 200% faster than the older one? but only marginally faster than comparable PC's? something mathematically doesn't add up
i am not a Microsoft apologist, but mac is in no way different then microsoft, nor are their products, had apple been of the same size as MS it would have acted no different, the whole issue is a matter of size, probability, marketshare and marketing
OS wise, Linux offers a far more interesting alternative, buy yourself a decent laptop or desktop without an OS preloaded, save a bit of money, install ubuntu, add compiz fusion if you like effects, install a couple of emulators for windows apps if you cannot find linux alternatives and welcome to the world of computing
if MS is hell, Apple is the inferno
if gates is satan, jobs is beelzebub | | | | | Orange Room Supporter
Offline Posts: 774 Thanks: 79
Thanked 46 Times in 35 Posts
Last Online: 1 Day Ago Join Date: Mon Jun 2005 | 
14th July 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by aboulzouz It was 3 years ago the last time i used a PC.
Mac is very convenient to me. It gives me the strength and the freedom
of a Unix kernel and the user friendly interface. | Actually, I meant something else.
Once you use a MAC, you'll never want to get near a PC again, whether MAC or something else.
MAC is so sucky it'll scare ya off 
Get any PC, it could be a 486 per-se, and run a slackware distro on it, and I assure you that you'll never need anything else for real! | | | | | Registered Member
Online Posts: 1,734 Thanks: 206
Thanked 259 Times in 178 Posts
Last Online: 4 Hours Ago Join Date: Sat Feb 2006 | 
14th July 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceberg Actually, I meant something else.
Once you use a MAC, you'll never want to get near a PC again, whether MAC or something else.
MAC is so sucky it'll scare ya off 
Get any PC, it could be a 486 per-se, and run a slackware distro on it, and I assure you that you'll never need anything else for real! | Have you tried OpenSuSE ? or SLED? I love what Yast can do, simplifies most of the tasks.
I am not a fan of Mac, the way i see it is Apple has managed to give an Interface to Unix and sacrificied some security and stability.
For me, I would choose PC anytime anyday! | | | | | Orange Room Supporter
Offline Posts: 774 Thanks: 79
Thanked 46 Times in 35 Posts
Last Online: 1 Day Ago Join Date: Mon Jun 2005 | 
14th July 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mar1K Have you tried OpenSuSE ? or SLED? I love what Yast can do, simplifies most of the tasks.
I am not a fan of Mac, the way i see it is Apple has managed to give an Interface to Unix and sacrificied some security and stability.
For me, I would choose PC anytime anyday! | SuSE's kernel isn't as customizable as Slack's, I tried it but never sticked to it. | | | |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |