Terror in Mumbai: India under attack

[Rainywinter]

Aoun, don't you feel a wee bit ridiculous with your endless crazy "joos" conspiracy theories after reading a fact that quite a few jews were tortured and executed in that terror attack?
Maybe you need some mental help or something? (seriously. I don't mean to offend you by saying that, but out of concern)
You're just very obsessed with hatred and blaming jews for everything wrong, and I don't think that's very healthy.

[Aoun4lebanon]

Originally Posted by Rainywinter

Aoun, don't you feel a wee bit ridiculous with your endless crazy "joos" conspiracy theories after reading a fact that quite a few jews were tortured and executed in that terror attack?
Maybe you need some mental help or something? (seriously. I don't mean to offend you by saying that, but out of concern)
You're just very obsessed with hatred and blaming jews for everything wrong, and I don't think that's very healthy.

On the contrary, I find it amuzing putting 'your likes' in the corner with a spot light just in front of everyone to see and analyze the truth. You see its simple, I have studied all your terrorist activities since USS Liberty and what comes out of it, all the way to what is currently happening in Gaza and Westbank and I conclude if someone needs social, religious you name it mental assistant its the Jews. Like what Michel Aoun said yesterday, those people have to either accept the return of the Pals and learn to live with them or they will regret


Good blog to read
Truth Package Machine


Mossad Motto 'By Way of Deception, thou shalt do War'
For years, Zionists have manipulated events for the purpose of having others fight their wars.
In Iraq, our government has thousands of Israeli advisors floating around our military bases, privy to all areas and Intel. In a normal operation, an Israeli intelligence agent finds a patrol’s route and relays it to Israeli contractors, who then plant a bomb, and two Arabs in a car are given the detonator.

The Marines walk down the route, the Arabs detonate the bomb, a few Marines are killed and maimed, and the other Marines seek revenge. Now, Israel moves to the next level, whereby they document the revenge to escalate the incident. Once again, Israel has recruited Arabs to act as their fodder.

A big operation is underway. IDF demolition experts blew up a 1500 year-old Mosque in Samarra, and they spread rumors that Americans did it. They have used their 'Contractors/Mercenaries' to act as death squads, kidnapping and killing Iraqis by the hundreds over the last 2 months.

The recent propaganda of films, and the documenting of two massacres by Marines, says they are laying the groundwork for a massive False-Flag terror attack. That operation may well be the stepping stone needed for the invasion of Iran.

[Abu Ruman]

Islamist terrorists doing what they're best at...surprise surprise.

Victims R.I.P.

[Abu Ruman]

Originally Posted by Rainywinter

Aoun, don't you feel a wee bit ridiculous with your endless crazy "joos" conspiracy theories after reading a fact that quite a few jews were tortured and executed in that terror attack?

In addition to that: a Turkish Muslim couple were spared and set free by the terrorists.

Makes it all the more likely that Jews were behind the whole thing

[Aoun4lebanon]

Al-Qaeda is a front organization of CIA and MOSSAD : Mumbai based group of intellectuals and human rights activists
Media Release
Jun. 13, 2007

The Mumbai based group alleged that Al-Qaeda is a front organization of CIA and MOSSAD. “There is enough evidence that the Al-Qaeda is a front organization of the CIA and MOSSAD. The Bush junta has used the bogey of terror and of Al Qaeda to justify his unending and ever expanding Global War on Terror, which is only a means of capturing the resources of the world and of establishing the sole hegemony of Israel in West Asia,” said the group of activists and intellectuals. The group is holding a press conference in Mumbai on Wednesday to “expose the links between Al-Qaeda and the CIA-MOSSAD”.

Holding American-Israeli operation accomplices of the 9/11 attack on the WTC, the spokesman of the group said that this has been widely written about in USA and Europe itself and more than 50% of the American people and far more Europeans, now believe and are convinced about this fact. He said that sections of the Indian ruling political and military elite are importing the same Bush-Olmert formula into India. “The increasing terror attacks only serve the cause of the Indian elite and divide the masses along communal lines. It is only the ordinary Indians who are the victims of terror either in temples, mosques, buses or trains,” he said adding that practically no political leader suffers a similar fate, where the terrorists are apprehended and killed in “encounters”.

“Every terror attack is meant to push and drag the Indian masses further into the waiting arms of Uncle Sam and the Israeli Goliath. Every terror attack spreads further hatred for Muslims and Islam and weakens the Indian Muslim community,” he said.

IndiaDaily - Al-Qaeda is a front organization of CIA and MOSSAD : Mumbai based group of intellectuals and human rights activists

[Abu Ruman]

Patternicity: Finding Meaningful Patterns in Meaningless Noise
Why the brain believes something is real when it is not

By Michael Shermer

Why do people see faces in nature, interpret window stains as human figures, hear voices in random sounds generated by electronic devices or find conspiracies in the daily news? A proximate cause is the priming effect, in which our brain and senses are prepared to interpret stimuli according to an expected model. UFOlogists see a face on Mars. Religionists see the Virgin Mary on the side of a building. Paranormalists hear dead people speaking to them through a radio receiver. Conspiracy theorists think 9/11 was an inside job by the Bush administration. Is there a deeper ultimate cause for why people believe such weird things? There is. I call it “patternicity,” or the tendency to find meaningful patterns in meaningless noise.

Traditionally, scientists have treated patternicity as an error in cognition. A type I error, or a false positive, is believing something is real when it is not (finding a nonexistent pattern). A type II error, or a false negative, is not believing something is real when it is (not recognizing a real pattern—call it “apat*ternicity”). In my 2000 book How We Believe (Times Books), I argue that our brains are belief engines: evolved pattern-recognition machines that connect the dots and create meaning out of the patterns that we think we see in nature. Sometimes A really is connected to B; sometimes it is not. When it is, we have learned something valuable about the environment from which we can make predictions that aid in survival and reproduction. We are the ancestors of those most successful at finding patterns. This process is called association learning, and it is fundamental to all animal behavior, from the humble worm C. elegans to H. sapiens.

Unfortunately, we did not evolve a Baloney Detection Network in the brain to distinguish between true and false patterns. We have no error-detection governor to modulate the pattern-recognition engine. (Thus the need for science with its self-correcting mechanisms of replication and peer review.) But such erroneous cognition is not likely to remove us from the gene pool and would therefore not have been selected against by evolution.

In a September paper in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, “The Evolution of Superstitious and Superstition-like Behaviour,” Harvard University biologist Kevin R. Foster and University of Helsinki biologist Hanna Kokko test my theory through evolutionary modeling and demonstrate that whenever the cost of believing a false pattern is real is less than the cost of not believing a real pattern, natural selection will favor patternicity. They begin with the formula pb > c, where a belief may be held when the cost (c) of doing so is less than the probability (p) of the benefit (b). For example, believing that the rustle in the grass is a dangerous predator when it is only the wind does not cost much, but believing that a dangerous predator is the wind may cost an animal its life.

The problem is that we are very poor at estimating such probabilities, so the cost of believing that the rustle in the grass is a dangerous predator when it is just the wind is relatively low compared with the opposite. Thus, there would have been a beneficial selection for believing that most patterns are real.

Through a series of complex formulas that include additional stimuli (wind in the trees) and prior events (past experience with predators and wind), the authors conclude that “the inability of individuals—human or otherwise—to assign causal probabilities to all sets of events that occur around them will often force them to lump causal associations with non-causal ones. From here, the evolutionary rationale for superstition is clear: natural selection will favour strategies that make many incorrect causal associations in order to establish those that are essential for survival and reproduction.”

In support of a genetic selection model, Foster and Kokko note that “predators only avoid nonpoisonous snakes that mimic a poisonous species in areas where the poisonous species is common” and that even such simple organisms as “Escherichia coli cells will swim towards physiologically inert methylated aspartate presumably owing to an adaptation to favour true aspartate.”

Such patternicities, then, mean that people believe weird things because of our evolved need to believe nonweird things.

(Source: Scientific American)