Quote:
Originally Posted by Salome I saw the video, it's a very good one:)
Well surely the sides in strength are not equal, but you think the world would accept a solution which makes only the arabs happy? |
When you are the more powerful side what makes you happy becomes more and more selfish. I already said that a one-state solution, which is a compromise, could work with tolerance-building plus education on both sides. I didn't say let's bring the Palestinian refugees back and throw the Jews into the sea!! Why wouldn't a one-state solution be acceptable and make Israeli Jews happy once racism is eradicated and tolerance is inculcated in their souls?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salome On the other hand will we really accept that all human lives are equally valuable, regardless of religion and nationality. Meaning a jew's life is equally valuable as an arab's life and vice versa? |
All Israeli Jews have to accept it first. Most of them relegated Palestinians to lower ranks of human beings and committed or supported the atrocities against Palestinians. Had it not been for that, Israel would have never become a state. Today, hatred is reciprocal and it has been for over 60 years, and the solution I talked about above seems to be the only humane solution to both sides, if we could get it to work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salome Am sorry but the right of return, however just it is, is not realistic. At least in the next decades to come. |
I, unfortunately, do not see it happening in the foreseeabe future, but just because it's near impossible today it doesn't mean it's not what should happen. Injustice will remain injustice regardless of whether we have the capacity to correct it or not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salome Tell me about that thin line...I was giving once a speech on Hamas and Hezbollah, and some academic/governmental @ssholes found my speech too biased and felt kinda offended how I dare to show them facts about the Israeli aggression and how I dare call HA and Hamas resistence....no chance in the western mainstream media they are considered terrorists |
I think both Hamas and Hizballah's discourse is not fit for dialogue nor proclamation to the rest of the world. It's too archaic, exclusive, narrow-minded, and discriminatory at times. Although I find Hizballah much more systematic and they know what they're doing more than Hamas, both don't stand a chance of being viewed as legitimate resistance movements by the populace of Western countries. With such movements, even at home a lot of Lebanese and Palestinians only back them up when it comes to certain issues and certain actions. Some of their actions may be viewed as resistance, while other actions might be viewed objectionably.
I don't know... it's a complex issue because even legitimate resistance through the course of history involved terrorism of some sort. When you fight a war in defence of your country you use violent means in hopes of terrorizing your enemy. I wish the world knew how to deal with such matters peacefully and without any loss in human lives, but things are not that way.
I for one, do not support entities or parties or leaders, I support - when I do - certain actions or stands.