advanced search
Contact Us tayyar.org
 
The Orange Room - forum.tayyar.org
 



Notices
Regional and International Politics Discuss anything related to Regional and International politics, from Arab-Israeli Conflict to US Presidency Elections

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  (#21 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
Aoun4lebanon's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 659
Thanks: 141
Thanked 87 Times in 53 Posts
Last Online: 18th August 2009
Join Date: Fri Apr 2006
View Aoun4lebanon's Photo Album
Default 10th August 2008

PNAC Neocon agenda wants a war with Russia for Israel

War Without End :: View topic - PNAC Neocon agenda wants a war with Russia for Israel

US and Israel are Using Gruzia to test some new portable weapons system which are satelite guided.... This war is basically to see what the Russians can do in such situations and see if they have some new ticks in the bag... They are studying intensly Russian Strategy and Military technology via this war..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  (#22 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
Aoun4lebanon's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 659
Thanks: 141
Thanked 87 Times in 53 Posts
Last Online: 18th August 2009
Join Date: Fri Apr 2006
View Aoun4lebanon's Photo Album
Default 10th August 2008

Is it a war between Israel and Russian?


"Israel backs Georgia in Caspian Oil Pipeline Battle with Russia
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report
...
Last year, the Georgian president commissioned from private Israeli security firms several hundred military advisers, estimated at up to 1,000, to train the Georgian armed forces in commando, air, sea, armored and artillery combat tactics. They also offer instruction on military intelligence and security for the central regime. Tbilisi also purchased weapons, intelligence and electronic warfare systems from Israel.
These advisers were undoubtedly deeply involved in the Georgian army’s preparations to conquer the South Ossetian capital Friday.
In recent weeks, Moscow has repeatedly demanded that Jerusalem halt its military assistance to Georgia, finally threatening a crisis in bilateral relations. Israel responded by saying that the only assistance rendered Tbilisi was “defensive.”
This has not gone down well in the Kremlin. Therefore, as the military crisis intensifies in South Ossetia, Moscow may be expected to punish Israel for its intervention."

DEBKAfile - Israel backs Georgia in Caspian Oil Pipeline Battle with Russia


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Israel "concearned" about Georgia as its main army supplier
Israel concerned about Georgia conflict
By HERB KEINON
Print Subscribe
E-mail Toolbar
Share article:

What's this?





Talkbacks for this article: 0


Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni is to convene a meeting of senior ministry officials on Sunday to deal with the Russian-Georgian flare-up, amid concern that Israeli arms sales to Georgia could harm relations with Russia.


Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni.
Photo: Ariel Jerozolimski

Slideshow: Pictures of the week The situation in South Ossetia is widely believed to be one of the topics of discussion over the weekend in Beijing between President Shimon Peres and Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin.

That meeting took place prior to Putin leaving China and flying to southern Russia to apparently oversee the situation.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, in what is thought to have been an indirect reference to Israel, lashed out against Georgia's Western allies.

RELATED
Israel to sell Georgia only 'defensive' weapons
What is the conflict in Georgia really about?
Quest for info on Arad helped forge arms sales to Georgia
US: Russia must halt attacks on Georgia
Jewish Agency: 200 Jews flee Russia-Georgia hostilities
"Those who have been supplying arms to Georgia, they should feel part of the blame for the loss of life," The New York Times quoted Lavrov as saying. He also was quoted as saying that foreign leaders "who have been appeasing Mr. [Georgian President Mikhail] Saakashvili's intentions, and helped create the feeling of impunity inside the Georgian [leader], should think twice about whether this is right."

Israeli diplomatic officials said Lavrov's comments were aimed at the US, Ukraine and Israel, which all have supplied Georgia with arms.

Ma'ariv, in an investigative report on Friday that diplomatic officials said was "highly accurate," said Israeli companies had sold some $300 million worth of military equipment to Georgia.

According to the report, Israeli defense officials were embarrassed in April when an Israeli-manufactured drone was shot down by the Russians, and again in May when another drone, and a state-of-the-art Israeli rocket system called Lynx, were on display at a Georgian military parade.

The Ma'ariv report said former government minister and Tel Aviv mayor Roni Milo was heavily involved in arms sales to Georgia, as a representative of Elbit and the Israeli Military Industries, and that Brig.-Gen (res.) Gal Hirsch, one of the senior officers who left the IDF after coming under blistering criticism following the Second Lebanon War, was heavily involved in the country in providing training for infantry and elite units.

According to the Ma'ariv story, the Russians sent a letter to Livni asking Israel to refrain from selling state-of-the-art weaponry to Georgia, and stating that Moscow had acceded to similar requests by Jerusalem in the past.

Israel has repeatedly asked Russia not to sell top-line weapons systems to Syria and Iran. According to the report, the Defense Ministry, which at first was hesitant - hoping to parley this into leverage to keep the Russians from selling weaponry to Iran or Syria - then acceded to the Foreign Ministry's request.

Israel, according to diplomatic officials, now only sells defensive weapons to Georgia.

In light of the escalating situation in Georgia, the Foreign Ministry issued an advisory against travel to the area, and has called on Israelis already there to contact the embassy in Tbilisi, or the situation room at the Foreign Ministry, to let them know their whereabouts. The Foreign Ministry also decided to send reinforcements to the embassy there to deal with the situation.

In recent years, Georgia has become a popular destination for Israeli trekkers. Coincidentally, Israel's new envoy to Georgia, Yitzhak Gerberg, was scheduled to leave for his new post on Saturday. Despite the situation on the ground, he left as scheduled

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satelli...cle%2FShowFull
Reply With Quote
  (#23 (permalink)) Old
Orange Room Supporter
 
Abou Sandal's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 9,896
Thanks: 1,460
Thanked 2,400 Times in 1,498 Posts
Last Online: 6 Minutes Ago
Join Date: Mon Jun 2007
View Abou Sandal's Photo Album
Default 10th August 2008

Israel - Georgia quiet alliance
Israel - Georgia quiet alliance
Wednesday, December 05, 2007

By Evgeny Sova

Recent events in Georgia have, once again, clearly shown that, despite the fall of the “evil empire” (i.e. the Soviet Union) and possibly due to the collapse of the two-pole world structure of the 90s, many smaller nations who emerged after the collapse have yet to taste political freedom.

In the mid 90s, instead of taking direct orders from the Kremlin, these countries were linked to Russia by gas and oil dependence. Now, some 17 years later, there is a danger that old Soviet traditions may emerge again. Newly empowered Russian diplomacy actively employs the principle that “whoever is not for us is against us”, especially toward the former Soviet republics. Those who managed to secure a new political patron (for example, the Baltic republics which became EU and NATO members) should consider themselves lucky. Russia’s blatant attempts to influence the internal affairs of these countries were stopped by European leaders in Brussels, though without much enthusiasm. Europe made it clear to Russia that it wasn’t about to “sell out” its new brothers even if it meant losing gas and electricity for the prosperous Western Europe. Now the question remains open for those who haven’t yet picked sides.


Choosing the pro-American path

In January 2004, Georgia made its choice. After the famous “Revolution of the Roses”, a young and ambitious politician named Mikhail Saakashvili came to power. Europe has always loved politicians like “Misha”: fluent in several European languages and yet “American” in spirit and education. Saakashvili immediately understood what Europe was expecting from him – maximum loyalty. Saakashvili did everything he could to deconstruct the image of Georgia as a former Soviet republic. And most importantly, Saakashvili openly challenged Moscow. During his presidential term, Georgia and the US entered a new level of military cooperation. It was no longer strange to see American soldiers in Tbilisi. Meanwhile, the attention of the US administration was focused squarely on the “Georgian West” – where Russian soldiers still had a major presence, albeit as a peacekeeping contingent in Southern Osetia and Abkhazia.

Immediately after assuming power, Saakashvili asked the West to help Georgia become a democracy. The president’s idea of guaranteed democratic stability is not to rule according to the will of the people, but rather through an improved Georgian army. One of his first presidential decrees in February of 2004 was to remove the chief of staff of the Georgian army, General Givi Lukuridze. In the months following key changes were put into effect in the Georgian army. Unexpectedly, (to the army) the tiny Georgian army (29 thousand soldiers) became the focus of the Pentagon’s attention. The US started to actively train the Georgian army, and in the spirit of cooperation, Tbilisi received some military equipment. As a way of saying thanks, Georgia sent a military contingent (about 300 soldiers) to occupied Iraq. Since then, the West has played a key role in the development of a new Georgia.

Saakashvili’s circle wasn’t about to limit itself to cooperation with the Americans. The Ukraine and Lithuania also gave Georgia military assistance, and later Israel, the chief ally of the United States in the Middle East, also made its contribution. The Israeli company “Elbit Marachot” won a contract to modernize the Russian-made SU-25 fighters of the Georgian air force. Although, unlike US involvement, the involvement of the Israeli company was purely commercial, the contract being the first steps in a new collaboration between Jerusalem and Tbilisi. The Americans were, unintentionally, the ones that made this cooperation possible. In the past, a large number of agreements made between Israeli military companies and the former Warsaw Pact countries, China and Turkey, were simply torpedoed by Washington. It is no secret that, generally, military contracts made by Israel must be approved by the White House.


Gal Hirsch: from Lebanon to Georgia

October 26, 2007, an issue of the Israeli paper Yediot Achronot contained the surprising headline: “Israeli general will help reform the Georgian army.” The article was about a retired brigadier general, Gal Hirsh, the former commander of the 91st division of the Northern military command. Hirsh is well known in Israel in connection with the second Lebanese war. After the end of the war and the publication of the preliminary findings of the fact-finding commission headed by former judge Eliahu Vinograd, Hirsh was the first to lay down his stars and retire. But the retired Brigadier General Hirsh did not remain idle for long, several months later, he founded a new company named Defensive Shield in Israel. The mission of the company was stated as “consulting services in the field of security and military cooperation.”

In Israel, every retiring army officer has the right to take paid leave before his release from the army. The higher the rank, the more leave an officer gets at the army’s expense. For the highest ranking officers such periods of “paid leave” can reach up to seven months, with all the perks that were available beforehand, including full salary and use of an official vehicle. However, there is a catch. A general on extended leave before retirement cannot start his own business, go abroad without permission and, most importantly, he is not permitted to manage issues related to the army or security. Sources in the Ministry of Defense informed Hirsh that, in order to open his company he had to forgo part of these perks. Thereby, giving him the necessary permission to conduct this type of work outside of Israel. The highest officials in the Ministry of Defense signed their names on the authorization allowing Hirsh to sell his experience abroad.

Gal Hirsh decided not to wait for the official conclusions of the Vinograd commission. He decided to establish his career before the echoes of the second Lebanese war destroyed it permanently. Just a few months after his resignation, Hirsh renewed old contacts from his army service in a special unit named “Shaldag.” According to press reports, it was his former aide in “Shaldag” who provided valuable assistance to Hirsh by introducing him to high ranking officials in Georgia. From that point on it was like a Cinderella story – Hirsh’s knowledge and experience was exactly what was needed to reform the Georgian army. Hirsh’s friends refuse to comment on these recent events, which were leaked to the press. Hirsh refuses to comment on pictures taken at the airport, before his flight to Tbilisi. The Georgian State Department's response was, “We do not know what Gal Hirsh will be doing in Georgia, but we are pretty sure it has nothing to do with the opera or ballet.”

Very soon, Defensive Shield should receive an answer from the Georgian Ministry of Defense regarding their cooperation. If Tbilisi decides to trust the reform of the army to a retired Israeli general, it will undoubtedly be done with the full approval of the Georgian president Mikhail Saakashvili. Saakashvili, a sincere friend of the Jewish people, understands that in matters like this friendship is of secondary importance. The primary importance is the strategic interests of his nation and their defense against possible future threats. Saakashvili will not impress his northern neighbor through a military alliance with Washington. However, an unexpected agreement with an Israeli company, even through a retired Israeli general, will undoubtedly be a cause for concern to the Kremlin. Israel can give Georgia what the US is reluctant to give them – intelligence. For Washington, sharing intelligence with Georgia could cause a serious problem in its relationship with Moscow. Jerusalem, however, can be a “wildcard” when it comes to putting pressure on Moscow. Simply asking Moscow not to sell weapons to Iran and Syria is not the same as demanding it, while holding a Georgian "ace" in your hand. As far as American interests are concerned, the Israeli-Georgian cooperation will only help the US. Another player will emerge from the southern border with Russia, which will be more useful than harmful to Washington. And most importantly, Israel is not a nation that employs a double standard in the new system of international interests, which is being established. Israel, as in the period of the Cold War, will find itself south of the imaginary fence between Russia and Georgia.

Israeli officials have no reaction to this scenario, which once again proves that Hirsh’s mission in Georgia is not limited to his personal desire to make a living. When issues of Israeli security and strategic interests come up, which closely interconnect worldwide, American interests are at stake, then everyone knows what’s going on and keeps quiet about it. So I guess, we’ll have to wait for the Georgians to say something concerning the issue. Saakashvili will not be able to keep such an important trump card to himself for too long – at any moment the game might turn against him.

| News and Analysis | Analysis | Israel - Georgia quiet alliance | Jerusalem News Agency (Israeli National Agency: News, Analysis, Articles and Photo Session)
Reply With Quote
  (#24 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
rayograph's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,161
Thanks: 29
Thanked 171 Times in 120 Posts
Last Online: 19 Hours Ago
Join Date: Mon Jan 2006
View rayograph's Photo Album
Default 10th August 2008

US faults Russia for rising violence in Georgia


By JOAN LOWY, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 15 minutes ago




WASHINGTON - Russia's use of overwhelming military force against Georgia, including strategic bombers and ballistic missiles, is disproportionate to any threat from the former Soviet state and could escalate tensions in the volatile region, a senior U.S. official said Saturday

The Bush administration official, who briefed reporters on condition his name not be used because of the sensitive nature of the situation, said Russia has attacked areas in Georgia that are far away from the separatist province of South Ossetia, where the fighting has centered. The official also said the Russian military is striking civilian targets.

"They have employed strategic bombers — the most potent air weaponry that is in the Russian arsenal .... They actually launched ballistic missile attacks on Georgian territory," the official said. He also said Russia has sent more than 1,000 paratroopers and armor into the region.

Russian bombing has also taken place in Abkhazia, a separate breakaway region of Georgia, far from South Ossetia, the official said.

"This is a dangerous escalation in the crisis," the official said. Russia's military response "marks a severe escalation and is being conducted in areas far, far from the South Ossetia zone of conflict, which is where the Russian side has said it needed to protect its citizens and peacekeepers. So the response has been far disproportionate to whatever threat Russia had been citing."

The U.S. official also scolded Moscow for stymieing attempts at mediation and refusing a cease-fire offer from Georgia.

"The Georgians have offered a cease-fire. The response by the Russians has been to step up the attacks, continue bombing civilians with strategic air assets and then to reject the notion of any international mediation at all — it's very difficult for us to understand that," the official said. "It is simply not acceptable that anyone would reject an offer of a cease-fire and a plea for international mediation."

The official criticized Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin for suggesting Georgia was conducting "genocide" in South Ossetia.

"Those are some pretty powerful words that are really not helping us to end the violence and bring together a new process that can resolve the conflict," the official said. "The line we're hearing right now (from Russia) is quite tough."

President Bush, in Beijing for the Olympics, spoke with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Saturday.
"The violence is endangering regional peace, civilian lives have been lost and others are endangered. We have urged an immediate halt to the violence and a stand-down by all troops. We call for an end to the Russian bombings," a grim Bush told reporters. He did not take any questions.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice talked with several European counterparts and planned to meet with the Russia's acting ambassador.

John McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, said he had spoken with Georgia President Mikhail Saakashvili late Saturday.
McCain called Russia's actions "totally, absolutely unacceptable" and said Bush should "should talk to the American people and talk to the world."
"I would be very direct with President Putin that these actions will have consequences long term, in terms of our relationship with Russia, and it is in violation of the norms of international conduct," he said in an interview with The Associated Press in Las Vegas.

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said he had talked with Rice and Saakashvili to condemn Russia's recent actions. He said top diplomats from the U.S., the European Union and the United Nations should become directly involved in mediating the military conflict.

"A genuinely neutral mediator — not the Russian government — must begin a process of negotiations immediately," Obama said in a statement.
Families and dependents of U.S. Embassy personnel in the Georgian capital, Tbilisi, were expected to receive permission to evacuate.


The U.S. official suggested Russia was looking for a way to draw Georgia into a conflict because Moscow wants to keep Georgia out of NATO.

Georgia, which borders the Black Sea between Turkey and Russia, was ruled by Moscow for most of the two centuries preceding the breakup of the Soviet Union. Georgia angered Russia by seeking NATO membership — a bid Moscow regards as part of a Western effort to weaken its influence in the region.

Russia wants to "keep Georgia kind of weak and off balance and to make it hard for Georgia to join NATO," the official said.

However, he said the United States and its NATO allies will not be drawn militarily into the Russian-Georgian conflict.

"This is a very localized conflict ... There is not a danger of a regional conflict at all in our minds," the official said.
Georgia has about 2,000 troops in Iraq and is the third-largest contributor to coalition forces after the U.S. and Britain. The Georgian government has called home those troops, and efforts are under way now to determine how the U.S. will transport those troops to Georgia, the official said.
Reply With Quote
  (#25 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
erzallubnan's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 734
Thanks: 128
Thanked 76 Times in 44 Posts
Last Online: 1 Week Ago
Join Date: Mon Sep 2005
View erzallubnan's Photo Album
Default 10th August 2008

The reason behind the Georgian conflict... read below. Which reminds me of a conflict and war that occurred in our country... same method, media and financiers

GEORGE SOROS & THE GEORGIAN CONFLICT
By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright © 2008


THE GEORGIAN “ROSE REVOLUTION” was funded by the Hungarian born Jewish financier, George Soros. The Rose Revolution forced President Eduard Shevardnadze out of office on November 23 2003 (St George’s Day in Georgia).

Soros installed Shevardnadze’s young protege, Mikhail Saakashvili, as the new and current President of Georgia. During the three months before the coup, Saakashvili, who was schooled & groomed in America, was glorying in lavish treatment from the Zionist led US State Department and the Jewish controlled media. And in the previous summer Soros had flown Saakashvili and his followers to a “revolution training seminar” in Belgrade Serbia.

Back in Georgia from his training by Soros in Belgrade, Saakashvili led thousands of demonstrators brandishing fresh red roses in their takeover of the President’s palace. This occurred in the freezing Georgian winter when fresh roses had to be flown in — courtesy of the Jew, George Soros, who had spent $42 million on his new Georgian puppet. No sooner had Saakashvili taken office that he vowed to bring the Russian supported South Ossetia & Abkhazia breakaway provinces back under Georgian control.

Soros and the US State Department, indeed, had publicly committed themselves to propping up the current anti-Russian Georgian President, Mikhail Saakashvili, considered by many to be an authoritarian thug. A confrontation between Russia and the US was now in the works. And it has come to a head with the recent conflagration in South Ossetia.

A BOILING HOT GEORGIAN COLD WAR

AMERICA’S PRO GEORGIAN POLICY is explained by Georgia’s access to the Caspian Sea’s oil wealth. The US backed British Petroleum (BP) pipeline, running from the Caspian Sea through Georgia, then below the Black Sea into Turkey, delivers oil to Europe and the US. The US & its European allies have been competing with Russia for control of the Caspian oil rich region.

The pipeline runs only 60 miles south of the South Ossetian capital, Tskhinvali, which sits right smack in the middle of northern Georgia. South Ossetia broke away from Georgia in the early 1990s and exists as an independent state with full Russian support. Most South Ossetian residents hold Russian passports.

The US considers Georgia as an ally and supports its desire to join NATO and the EU. Moscow opposes both goals. Georgia’s pro Western stance has riled Russia because Moscow regards the entire region as its own sphere of influence.

In April 2002, the US started the “Georgia Train and Equip Program” which involved US training of Georgian forces. Soon after, Georgian militaries were sent to Iraq to form part of the US/UK occupation forces there. With regard to the current South Ossetia conflict, the US has been supplying Georgia with both equipment and military advisers. And Russia is now accusing the US of orchestrating the war.

Moreover, the US partner in Zionist international hegemony, the State of Israel, assisted Georgia in its August 8 2008 attack on the South Ossetian capital, Tskhinvali, with a bevy of its own military advisers. This brought the conflict to a military climax.

Thus, Georgia will continue to be a cold war hotspot with Russia and the US competing to control the Caspian oil bonanza. And the Jew, George Soros, and his puppet, Mikhail Saakashvili, have brought this new cold war centered in Georgia to a boiling head.
Reply With Quote
  (#26 (permalink)) Old
Orange Room Supporter
 
Libnene Qu7's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 842
Thanked 428 Times in 238 Posts
Last Online: 1 Day Ago
Join Date: Mon Aug 2005
View Libnene Qu7's Photo Album
Default 10th August 2008

It's going to be fun watching the Russians trample the Georgians into the medieval era.
Reply With Quote
  (#27 (permalink)) Old
 
GeaGea SkyWalkeR's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,676
Thanks: 103
Thanked 35 Times in 28 Posts
Last Online: 17th September 2008
Join Date: Wed Nov 2005
View GeaGea SkyWalkeR's Photo Album
Default 10th August 2008

The Georgians should do what Russia is doing in Abkhazia and South ossetia to Georgia,

They should just open passage to Chechnya, Just turn a blind eye, It will take care of itself. Russians are fragile. Very similar to the Israeli's, They can not sustain a long guerrilla war.

The Georgians can't take the Russian's on in a conventional war. Why try,
Reply With Quote
  (#28 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
General my General!'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 268
Thanked 224 Times in 165 Posts
Last Online: 3 Minutes Ago
Join Date: Fri Nov 2005
View General my General!'s Photo Album
Default 10th August 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Libnene Qu7 View Post
It's going to be fun watching the Russians trample the Georgians into the medieval era.
How so amigo? Since when has the the murder of civilians been fun to watch?

Regardless of whose wrong or right, its the innocent that suffer the most. It's not all that different from here.
Reply With Quote
  (#29 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
Garabet B's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 505
Thanks: 52
Thanked 109 Times in 78 Posts
Last Online: 27th April 2009
Join Date: Sat Dec 2007
View Garabet B's Photo Album
Default 10th August 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeaGea SkyWalkeR View Post
The Georgians should do what Russia is doing in Abkhazia and South ossetia to Georgia,

They should just open passage to Chechnya, Just turn a blind eye, It will take care of itself. Russians are fragile. Very similar to the Israeli's, They can not sustain a long guerrilla war.

The Georgians can't take the Russian's on in a conventional war. Why try,
ut

russians cant take a long guerilla war ..... GET REAL !
i can still remember the beautiful sight of mother russians artilleries ( hundreds of them ) parked close to each other and bombing at the same time
chechnya was taken care of in a matter of days !

on a side note. abkhazia entered the war to regain its territories who r still in georgia, same for russia. armenia should do the same and enter the war and re-gain tchavakhk region ( south of georgia).

+ armenia and russia have mou3a7adet dife3 , it means armenia is obliged to go into any war that threatens Russia.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Garabet B For This Useful Post:
LebSpy (10th August 2008), sev (11th August 2008)
  (#30 (permalink)) Old
CPL
Registered Member
 
CPL's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,480
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 94
Thanked 213 Times in 127 Posts
Last Online: 3 Weeks Ago
Join Date: Tue May 2004
View CPL's Photo Album
Default 10th August 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garabet B View Post



+ armenia and russia have mou3a7adet dife3 , it means armenia is obliged to go into any war that threatens Russia.
Well Russia is not really threatened, the mou3ahadeh is basically to protect Armenia, especially from Azeri attacks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Orange Room - forum.tayyar.org The Orange Room Main Forums Regional and International Politics

Tags
enter, ossetia, russian, south, tanks, war


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Forums Directory