advanced search
Contact Us tayyar.org
 
The Orange Room - forum.tayyar.org
 



Notices
Regional and International Politics Discuss anything related to Regional and International politics, from Arab-Israeli Conflict to US Presidency Elections

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  (#1 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
rayograph's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,161
Thanks: 29
Thanked 171 Times in 120 Posts
Last Online: 7 Hours Ago
Join Date: Mon Jan 2006
View rayograph's Photo Album
Default Military of Syria - 6th September 2007

with the rising tension between Israel and Syria, especially after what happened today, the conflict seems to be growing nearer...

can Syria afford a war with Israel? what sort of weapons does it have today and did it acquire new equipments? what would be its strategy? and what chances does it have of resisting and achieving something?

Military of Syria

Current Structure and Organization of the Syrian Army
  • 200,000 personnel plus 280,000 conscripts, total 480,000<SUP class=reference id=_ref-0>[1]</SUP>
  • 3 Corps HQ (1st, 2nd, and 3rd)
  • 7 armoured divisions (apparently 1st, 3rd, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, 11th<SUP class=reference id=_ref-1>[2]</SUP>)
  • 3 understrength mechanised divisions (4th, 7th, and 10th)
  • 4 independent infantry brigades
  • 14th Special Forces Division with 3 SF regiments; ten independent regiments
  • 2 independent artillery brigades
  • 2 independent anti-tank brigades
  • Three Surface-to-surface missile brigades (each three battalions)(one brigade with FROG-7, one brigade with SS-21 Scarab, one brigade with Scud-B/C/D)
  • Two coastal defence missile brigades (one with 12 SS-C-1B Sepal launchers, one with 12 P-15 Termit launchers, alternative designation SS-C-3 'Styx'). Also they are strong rumors that Syria received C-802 systems and 100 missiles from Iran.
  • One border guard brigade
  • One Republican Guard division (one artillery regiment, one mechanised brigade, three armoured brigades)
Equipment

-Tanks--APC/IFV-- Artillery-- Rocket Launchers--Surface to Surface missiles-- Anti Tank-- Air Defence- Syrian Navy

Equipment:
  • Frigates:
<DL><DD>2 Petya II
</DD></DL>
  • Missile Boats:
<DL><DD>2 Osa I
<DD>8 Osa II
</DD></DL>
  • Amphibious warfare vessels:
<DL><DD>3 Polnocny B
</DD></DL>
  • Mine Warfare vessels :
<DL><DD>1 Sonya <DD>3 Yevgenya </DD></DL>
  • Naval aviation:
<DL><DD>11 Mil Mi-14PL
<DD>2 Kamov Ka-28PL </DD></DL>Aircraft

Interceptors
  • 11 MiG-25 ,to be phased out
  • 8 MiG-31E to be purchased;<SUP class=reference id=_ref-0>[1]</SUP>
Fighters
  • 177 MiG-21, plans to upgrade them, possibly with India MiG-32.de
  • 106 MiG-23, including the -BN, plans to upgrade.
  • 20 MiG-29, with plans to upgrade to MiG-29SMT, and acquire a squadron of MiG-29M2. <SUP class=reference id=_ref-1>[2]</SUP>
Ground Attack
Trainers
Transports
Helicopters
Missiles


Air-to-air
Air-to-surface
Surface-to-air
source: wikipedia
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  (#2 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
rayograph's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,161
Thanks: 29
Thanked 171 Times in 120 Posts
Last Online: 7 Hours Ago
Join Date: Mon Jan 2006
View rayograph's Photo Album
Default 6th September 2007

MiGs Will Defend Syria and Iran

Russia has begun to implement the contract signed by Rosoboronexport with Syria this year for the delivery of five MiG-31E fighter-interceptors.

That means that Russia is renewing arms deliveries to the Middle East after a hiatus due to the war in Lebanon.

Iran may be the big winner from the deal, since there exists an Iranian-Syrian mutual defense agreement, and Iran is financing Damascus's purchase.

Several sources in the military-industrial complex told Kommersant that OAO Nizhny Novgorod Sokol Plant has begun working on the five MiG-31E aircraft.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007
naval open source intelligence
Reply With Quote
  (#3 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
rayograph's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,161
Thanks: 29
Thanked 171 Times in 120 Posts
Last Online: 7 Hours Ago
Join Date: Mon Jan 2006
View rayograph's Photo Album
Default 12th September 2007

وفي شروح متعددة لمراسلين ومحللين أمنيين في إسرائيل، كان البارز ما قاله محرر الشؤون الامنية والعسكرية في صحيفة «يديعوت أحرونوت» رونين بروغمان، الذي لمّح في سياق كلامه، الى أن الصواريخ السورية المزودة بالرؤوس الكيميائية ليست بعيدة عن متناول الطائرات الاسرائيلية، وأنها موجودة في الشمال السوري. وأضاف بروغمان انه بحسب المعلومات المتوافرة، لم يهتم السوريون بالموضوع النووي لأن «لديهم حلولاً أخرى استراتيجية لما تملكه إسرائيل من سلاح، وهو السلاح الكيميائي»، ولديهم كميات كبيرة منه، وهذه «الاسلحة موجودة في الشمال». ولفت الى أن هناك أماكن يقوم السوريون فيها بإنتاج صواريخ «سكاد ـــــ سي» و«سكاد ـــــ بي»، فضلاً عن أنهم «حصلوا على صواريخ جاهزة من كوريا الشمالية، ثم أخذوا ينتجونها بأنفسهم بمساعدة من الإيرانيين

12/9/2007
Al Akhbar


Reply With Quote
  (#4 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
proIsrael-nonIsraeli's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 1,758
Thanks: 12
Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts
Last Online: 1 Hour Ago
Join Date: Sun Mar 2007
View proIsrael-nonIsraeli's Photo Album
Default 12th September 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by rayograph View Post
Air Defence-
Fighters
  • 177 MiG-21, plans to upgrade them, possibly with India MiG-32.de
  • 106 MiG-23, including the -BN, plans to upgrade.
  • 20 MiG-29, with plans to upgrade to MiG-29SMT, and acquire a squadron of MiG-29M2. <SUP class=reference id=_ref-1>[2]</SUP>
If Israelis will be able to take care of list above it will effectively convert rest of Syrian hardware in to useless junk.

It will be difficult but doable.
Reply With Quote
  (#5 (permalink)) Old
Orange Room Supporter
 
Hye4Lebanon's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,441
Thanks: 0
Thanked 136 Times in 85 Posts
Last Online: 12 Hours Ago
Join Date: Wed Feb 2005
View Hye4Lebanon's Photo Album
Default 12th September 2007

If Israel does not destroy the Syrian Airforce in 3 days, it will be a long and ugly war.
Reply With Quote
  (#6 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
proIsrael-nonIsraeli's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 1,758
Thanks: 12
Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts
Last Online: 1 Hour Ago
Join Date: Sun Mar 2007
View proIsrael-nonIsraeli's Photo Album
Default 12th September 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hye4Lebanon View Post
If Israel does not destroy the Syrian Airforce in 3 days, it will be a long and ugly war.
I do not think 3 days is realistic term. I think it will be more like few weeks to a month. And Israelis will incur some losses too.
Reply With Quote
  (#7 (permalink)) Old
Orange Room Supporter
 
Hye4Lebanon's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,441
Thanks: 0
Thanked 136 Times in 85 Posts
Last Online: 12 Hours Ago
Join Date: Wed Feb 2005
View Hye4Lebanon's Photo Album
Default 12th September 2007

then for sure it will be a long war.

Israel's biggest aim is fast and precise. If they fail to get what they want in 3 days, then it will be a long war. If it stretches beyond the 1 month, Israel will be in trouble economically. It can't afford being in war for over a month. Most its army is in reserves.
Reply With Quote
  (#8 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
proIsrael-nonIsraeli's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 1,758
Thanks: 12
Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts
Last Online: 1 Hour Ago
Join Date: Sun Mar 2007
View proIsrael-nonIsraeli's Photo Album
Default 12th September 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hye4Lebanon View Post
then for sure it will be a long war.

Israel's biggest aim is fast and precise. If they fail to get what they want in 3 days, then it will be a long war. If it stretches beyond the 1 month, Israel will be in trouble economically. It can't afford being in war for over a month. Most its army is in reserves.
I fear the same but then I remember 1948 war lasted a year.

Last war lasted for one month and Israeli economy was nowhere near collapse.

May be they have more steam than we give them credit for.

Please, bare in mind that when I say "to a month" I mean air war.

Once that part is over rest will be just turkey shoot from Israeli point of view.
Reply With Quote
  (#9 (permalink)) Old
Orange Room Supporter
 
Hye4Lebanon's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,441
Thanks: 0
Thanked 136 Times in 85 Posts
Last Online: 12 Hours Ago
Join Date: Wed Feb 2005
View Hye4Lebanon's Photo Album
Default 12th September 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by proIsrael-nonIsraeli View Post
I fear the same but then I remember 1948 war lasted a year.

Last war lasted for one month and Israeli economy was nowhere near collapse.

May be they have more steam than we give them credit for.

Please, bare in mind that when I say "to a month" I mean air war.

Once that part is over rest will be just turkey shoot from Israeli point of view.
true, but 1948 was different...can't compare.

The July 06 war was "technically" not considered a war by Olmert. I personally think there will not be any war with Syria given the difference between the Syrians and the Iranians is that the Syrians want to talk as opposed to Iran.

If the Syrian Air defense systems go offline, and the air force is shut, then yes, turkey shoot. But times have changed and the Syrians know this, the longer the war is stretched the better the chances are for a "victory". They (the Syrians) can take all the beating they want, but "riding" the war is their aim at the moment.

Israel can't afford it, at the same time can't stretch it that far. At least international pressure will always put the Israelis at bay. Of course there will be hardliners who want to plant a flag in Damascus.

Lets take one step back, what will be the aim of this war?
Reply With Quote
  (#10 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
proIsrael-nonIsraeli's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 1,758
Thanks: 12
Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts
Last Online: 1 Hour Ago
Join Date: Sun Mar 2007
View proIsrael-nonIsraeli's Photo Album
Default 12th September 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hye4Lebanon View Post
true, but 1948 was different...can't compare.

The July 06 war was "technically" not considered a war by Olmert. I personally think there will not be any war with Syria given the difference between the Syrians and the Iranians is that the Syrians want to talk as opposed to Iran.

If the Syrian Air defense systems go offline, and the air force is shut, then yes, turkey shoot. But times have changed and the Syrians know this, the longer the war is stretched the better the chances are for a "victory". They (the Syrians) can take all the beating they want, but "riding" the war is their aim at the moment.

Israel can't afford it, at the same time can't stretch it that far. At least international pressure will always put the Israelis at bay. Of course there will be hardliners who want to plant a flag in Damascus.

Lets take one step back, what will be the aim of this war?
Aim of the war?

I do not care about Syrian goals, I see few for Israel.

One, cut logistical ties between Hezbollah and Iran.

Two, remove Syrian threat.

Three, destroy Syrian hope of getting Golans back.

Four, (long shot) to tear off Syria from Iran.

There may be more. I just do not see it yet.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Orange Room - forum.tayyar.org The Orange Room Main Forums Regional and International Politics


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Forums Directory