 | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 5,161 Thanks: 29
Thanked 171 Times in 120 Posts
Last Online: 7 Hours Ago Join Date: Mon Jan 2006 | Military of Syria -
6th September 2007
with the rising tension between Israel and Syria, especially after what happened today, the conflict seems to be growing nearer...
can Syria afford a war with Israel? what sort of weapons does it have today and did it acquire new equipments? what would be its strategy? and what chances does it have of resisting and achieving something?
Military of Syria
Current Structure and Organization of the Syrian Army - 200,000 personnel plus 280,000 conscripts, total 480,000<SUP class=reference id=_ref-0>[1]</SUP>
- 3 Corps HQ (1st, 2nd, and 3rd)
- 7 armoured divisions (apparently 1st, 3rd, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, 11th<SUP class=reference id=_ref-1>[2]</SUP>)
- 3 understrength mechanised divisions (4th, 7th, and 10th)
- 4 independent infantry brigades
- 14th Special Forces Division with 3 SF regiments; ten independent regiments
- 2 independent artillery brigades
- 2 independent anti-tank brigades
- Three Surface-to-surface missile brigades (each three battalions)(one brigade with FROG-7, one brigade with SS-21 Scarab, one brigade with Scud-B/C/D)
- Two coastal defence missile brigades (one with 12 SS-C-1B Sepal launchers, one with 12 P-15 Termit launchers, alternative designation SS-C-3 'Styx'). Also they are strong rumors that Syria received C-802 systems and 100 missiles from Iran.
- One border guard brigade
- One Republican Guard division (one artillery regiment, one mechanised brigade, three armoured brigades)
Equipment
-Tanks- -APC/IFV- - Artillery- - Rocket Launchers- -Surface to Surface missiles- - Anti Tank- - Air Defence- Syrian Navy
Equipment: <DL><DD>2 Petya II
</DD></DL> <DL><DD>2 Osa I
<DD>8 Osa II
</DD></DL> - Amphibious warfare vessels:
<DL><DD>3 Polnocny B
</DD></DL> <DL><DD>1 Sonya <DD>3 Yevgenya </DD></DL> <DL><DD>11 Mil Mi-14PL
<DD>2 Kamov Ka-28PL </DD></DL>Aircraft Interceptors - 11 MiG-25 ,to be phased out
- 8 MiG-31E to be purchased;<SUP class=reference id=_ref-0>[1]</SUP>
Fighters - 177 MiG-21, plans to upgrade them, possibly with India MiG-32.de
- 106 MiG-23, including the -BN, plans to upgrade.
- 20 MiG-29, with plans to upgrade to MiG-29SMT, and acquire a squadron of MiG-29M2. <SUP class=reference id=_ref-1>[2]</SUP>
Ground Attack Trainers Transports Helicopters Missiles Air-to-air Air-to-surface Surface-to-air source: wikipedia | | | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 5,161 Thanks: 29
Thanked 171 Times in 120 Posts
Last Online: 7 Hours Ago Join Date: Mon Jan 2006 | 
6th September 2007
MiGs Will Defend Syria and Iran
Russia has begun to implement the contract signed by Rosoboronexport with Syria this year for the delivery of five MiG-31E fighter-interceptors.
That means that Russia is renewing arms deliveries to the Middle East after a hiatus due to the war in Lebanon.
Iran may be the big winner from the deal, since there exists an Iranian-Syrian mutual defense agreement, and Iran is financing Damascus's purchase.
Several sources in the military-industrial complex told Kommersant that OAO Nizhny Novgorod Sokol Plant has begun working on the five MiG-31E aircraft.
Wednesday, June 20, 2007 naval open source intelligence | | | | | Registered Member
Offline Posts: 5,161 Thanks: 29
Thanked 171 Times in 120 Posts
Last Online: 7 Hours Ago Join Date: Mon Jan 2006 | 
12th September 2007
وفي شروح متعددة لمراسلين ومحللين أمنيين في إسرائيل، كان البارز ما قاله محرر الشؤون الامنية والعسكرية في صحيفة «يديعوت أحرونوت» رونين بروغمان، الذي لمّح في سياق كلامه، الى أن الصواريخ السورية المزودة بالرؤوس الكيميائية ليست بعيدة عن متناول الطائرات الاسرائيلية، وأنها موجودة في الشمال السوري. وأضاف بروغمان انه بحسب المعلومات المتوافرة، لم يهتم السوريون بالموضوع النووي لأن «لديهم حلولاً أخرى استراتيجية لما تملكه إسرائيل من سلاح، وهو السلاح الكيميائي»، ولديهم كميات كبيرة منه، وهذه «الاسلحة موجودة في الشمال». ولفت الى أن هناك أماكن يقوم السوريون فيها بإنتاج صواريخ «سكاد ـــــ سي» و«سكاد ـــــ بي»، فضلاً عن أنهم «حصلوا على صواريخ جاهزة من كوريا الشمالية، ثم أخذوا ينتجونها بأنفسهم بمساعدة من الإيرانيين 12/9/2007 Al Akhbar | | | | | Registered Member
Online Posts: 1,758 Thanks: 12
Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts
Last Online: 1 Hour Ago Join Date: Sun Mar 2007 | 
12th September 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayograph Air Defence- Fighters - 177 MiG-21, plans to upgrade them, possibly with India MiG-32.de
- 106 MiG-23, including the -BN, plans to upgrade.
- 20 MiG-29, with plans to upgrade to MiG-29SMT, and acquire a squadron of MiG-29M2. <SUP class=reference id=_ref-1>[2]</SUP>
| If Israelis will be able to take care of list above it will effectively convert rest of Syrian hardware in to useless junk.
It will be difficult but doable. | | | | | Orange Room Supporter
Offline Posts: 3,441 Thanks: 0
Thanked 136 Times in 85 Posts
Last Online: 12 Hours Ago Join Date: Wed Feb 2005 | 
12th September 2007
If Israel does not destroy the Syrian Airforce in 3 days, it will be a long and ugly war. | | | | | Registered Member
Online Posts: 1,758 Thanks: 12
Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts
Last Online: 1 Hour Ago Join Date: Sun Mar 2007 | 
12th September 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hye4Lebanon If Israel does not destroy the Syrian Airforce in 3 days, it will be a long and ugly war. | I do not think 3 days is realistic term. I think it will be more like few weeks to a month. And Israelis will incur some losses too. | | | | | Orange Room Supporter
Offline Posts: 3,441 Thanks: 0
Thanked 136 Times in 85 Posts
Last Online: 12 Hours Ago Join Date: Wed Feb 2005 | 
12th September 2007
then for sure it will be a long war.
Israel's biggest aim is fast and precise. If they fail to get what they want in 3 days, then it will be a long war. If it stretches beyond the 1 month, Israel will be in trouble economically. It can't afford being in war for over a month. Most its army is in reserves. | | | | | Registered Member
Online Posts: 1,758 Thanks: 12
Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts
Last Online: 1 Hour Ago Join Date: Sun Mar 2007 | 
12th September 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hye4Lebanon then for sure it will be a long war.
Israel's biggest aim is fast and precise. If they fail to get what they want in 3 days, then it will be a long war. If it stretches beyond the 1 month, Israel will be in trouble economically. It can't afford being in war for over a month. Most its army is in reserves. | I fear the same but then I remember 1948 war lasted a year.
Last war lasted for one month and Israeli economy was nowhere near collapse.
May be they have more steam than we give them credit for.
Please, bare in mind that when I say "to a month" I mean air war.
Once that part is over rest will be just turkey shoot from Israeli point of view. | | | | | Orange Room Supporter
Offline Posts: 3,441 Thanks: 0
Thanked 136 Times in 85 Posts
Last Online: 12 Hours Ago Join Date: Wed Feb 2005 | 
12th September 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by proIsrael-nonIsraeli I fear the same but then I remember 1948 war lasted a year.
Last war lasted for one month and Israeli economy was nowhere near collapse.
May be they have more steam than we give them credit for.
Please, bare in mind that when I say "to a month" I mean air war.
Once that part is over rest will be just turkey shoot from Israeli point of view. | true, but 1948 was different...can't compare.
The July 06 war was "technically" not considered a war by Olmert. I personally think there will not be any war with Syria given the difference between the Syrians and the Iranians is that the Syrians want to talk as opposed to Iran.
If the Syrian Air defense systems go offline, and the air force is shut, then yes, turkey shoot. But times have changed and the Syrians know this, the longer the war is stretched the better the chances are for a "victory". They (the Syrians) can take all the beating they want, but "riding" the war is their aim at the moment.
Israel can't afford it, at the same time can't stretch it that far. At least international pressure will always put the Israelis at bay. Of course there will be hardliners who want to plant a flag in Damascus.
Lets take one step back, what will be the aim of this war? | | | | | Registered Member
Online Posts: 1,758 Thanks: 12
Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts
Last Online: 1 Hour Ago Join Date: Sun Mar 2007 | 
12th September 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hye4Lebanon true, but 1948 was different...can't compare.
The July 06 war was "technically" not considered a war by Olmert. I personally think there will not be any war with Syria given the difference between the Syrians and the Iranians is that the Syrians want to talk as opposed to Iran.
If the Syrian Air defense systems go offline, and the air force is shut, then yes, turkey shoot. But times have changed and the Syrians know this, the longer the war is stretched the better the chances are for a "victory". They (the Syrians) can take all the beating they want, but "riding" the war is their aim at the moment.
Israel can't afford it, at the same time can't stretch it that far. At least international pressure will always put the Israelis at bay. Of course there will be hardliners who want to plant a flag in Damascus.
Lets take one step back, what will be the aim of this war? | Aim of the war?
I do not care about Syrian goals, I see few for Israel.
One, cut logistical ties between Hezbollah and Iran.
Two, remove Syrian threat.
Three, destroy Syrian hope of getting Golans back.
Four, (long shot) to tear off Syria from Iran.
There may be more. I just do not see it yet. | | | |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |