advanced search
Contact Us tayyar.org
 
The Orange Room - forum.tayyar.org
 



Notices
Regional and International Politics Discuss anything related to Regional and International politics, from Arab-Israeli Conflict to US Presidency Elections

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  (#61 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
magnolia's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Last Online: 13th March 2008
Join Date: Thu May 2007
View magnolia's Photo Album
Default 12th March 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Youchka View Post
Anyone knows anything about this?

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7nD7dbkkBIA&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7nD7dbkkBIA&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
Very ironic to view this.

I have been doing research for quite some time since I concluded I needed to look back at human history before I could move forward to understand the present and so much of our human origins have been kept and discouraged from us.

I concluded much of what he states but not in the same fashion or manner and he speaks in the present context,for all intent and purposes not much has changed for people over the history of time with the exception that what is happening now is more detrimental to us/non elites and everything we are doing/our environment our social structure is unsustainable and most disturbing to the family unit our children,our social unit/connection and of course the fundamentals of our values,ethics and nature and indeed our own sense of humanity.

We pay into the system from the moment we are born and later pay for the dirt we are buried in.

It was interesting that he brings up the womans movement as there is now a need for two incomes to support the family while our children are given to strangers and institutions,when our children/babies do make it home parents are often exhausted and have very little input and meaningful energy to invest with their children.

Not natural and not good for our kids.We need to have time to nurture and teach them.
That is not to say women belong in the home but it does mean that parents need time to bond and nurture their children.
Children need play to learn social skills,young children do not need homework and math skills.

We need more time with our families and less work/absence.
Not the other way around.


Our societies are designed for us NOT by us.
Oil economies benefit only a select few and Not ordinary masses .
Oil harms and degrades the environment and always will.There are no fixes/no good way to use oil.
Oil is so lucrative to the elite and powerful that wars are imposed.

There are alternative energies and alternative economies but none of these alternatives would benefit and sustain the elite and the present class system.
Alternative economies and alternative energy would mean a balanced and equitable world.

Governments employ social scientists and social engineers,archaeologist/social and other wise.

All human beings are born with the same intelligence values.
The differences are shaped by our environments and experiences.

Most people don't engage in politics because they are mystified and cannot reconcile events.

Given that we have a small group of corporate media this should not come as a surprise and it is indeed intentional.

Media tycoon Rupert Murdoch attended national security meetings at 10 Downing street while the government was under Tony Blair.

Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle were among the board members under Hollinger International re:Conrad Black.

When you tell a child no but offer no rational the child becomes mystified since there is no way to complete and reconcile the event .

As adults the media simply give headlines and one sided opinions and leaves the viewer no conclusion and an incomplete equation.
To satisfy an equation you need more than one side,opinion.

The viewer cannot conclude the "why " and has to walk away taking only the one stated view.
The viewer is left with two options,take the word of his or her government and or the side for which you have no real information,the enemy.

No surprise as to what is occurring today.

We need to unify as a global community and we need to speak out for one another.

Human rights abuses should never be ignored and once human rights become acceptable the same abuses can and will be applied to all.

WE are through inaction allowing and setting the standard of human value/life.

Read up on Sumerian and Pagan texts.
You will find the writings and stories for which all major religions are based today.

Don't take the gods literally as they were mortal and did parish.

I haven't finished my journey and I wish you all well with your own.

Always trust your instincts and know that no one is born any better than any one else. No one.:)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  (#62 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
Abu Ruman's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 594
Thanks: 5
Thanked 42 Times in 32 Posts
Last Online: 4th August 2009
Join Date: Thu Jan 2007
View Abu Ruman's Photo Album
Default 12th March 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Aoun View Post
Obviously you didn't watch the first video in my post (post #8) where fema is made to look very amateur.

Similarly http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=6017
and http://www.ae911truth.org/speakings.php#speak44

In fact, there are more scientists and architectural structural engineers that favor the demolition theory based on the facts of the collapses, than your theorists. Now why is that i wonder? Perhaps because hypothetico-deductivity based on observation (since conveniently within days all evidence was turned into recycled scrap metal and shipped off to India) clearly provide empirical evidence that two planes hitting those buildings simply couldn't have caused them to collapse. fema has been red-faced and refuses to go up against those scientists in an open-debate. If i was them, i wouldn't either.
The relevant point is that - irrespective of their historical credibility - the case they make, is still scientifically/logically sound (which you yourself said, is what should matter).

What we do know is that planes hit those towers and triggered a chaotic situation which very likely percolated through that entire location (which we know is not logically impossible nor improbable). That is what we have evidence of.

Anything else is speculative and conjectural. Thus, it will remain as such until further, unambiguous and positive evidence contradicts the present facts.

I also read about some actress (I forgot her name) who thinks 9/11 and the moon landing, were both conspiracy/hoax (for the very same reasons of 'logical impossibility' in both scenarios).
Reply With Quote
  (#63 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
CEDARLAND's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 389
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Last Online: 12th June 2008
Join Date: Thu Jul 2006
View CEDARLAND's Photo Album
Default 12th March 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abu Ruman View Post
Buddy, its very very simple: you dont have evidence. Dead end.

There is nothing opaque about this. If you dont have proof, then its a shut-case.

I'd really like to open a thread on the moon-landing now. This is very exciting. The proponents of the moon-landing hoax theory also make 'scientific' arguments, suggesting [logically speaking] how no one could have landed on the moon.

I can post it if you want.
Wanna proof ?
Here we go. The administration had an advance warning of the plot but did nothing to prevent it. I am NOT saying that the Administration did it. They were complacent AND FIRST AND FOREMOST IN THE KNOW - isn't that enough ?

Transcription of telephone conversation on August 4, 2006

From
Israeli Embassy, Washington D.C. Telephone Number (202) 364-5581

To
unidentified individual at CIA, Washington D.C., Telephone Number (703) 482-1102

Commenced 0913 hrs, concluded 0931 hrs.

Speaker A Amir Maimon - - Minister-Counselor and Head of Political Department , Embassy of Israel, Washington, D.C.

Speaker B Unidentified individual located at CIA headquarters, Langley, VA

A: We need to discuss the last major episode in 2001. There is not so much for us to lose if any of your people get this out?

B: Everything went into the burn bags.

A: We should hope so but there are always those who like to make copies?

B: Not in this case. Believe me, they cleaned everything out.

A: It wouldn?t look that bad for us because we did keep you courant, didn't we? You know you had everything in advance of the date.

B: Yes, we did but it's all gone now. That was part of the deal, after all. Everything went.

A: But we still have copies, you know. I have reviewed these and believe me, it doesn?t make us look bad. We kept you right up to the mark on what we were doing. And you certainly knew almost to the minute when, where and how it was happening. Our hands are clean but yours?.

B: We passed everything along, everything. Who knows, someone on your side might have leaked something and then the media bastards would be all over us, not to mention the White House.

A: We're interested to know why someone with you hasn't gone to the press?

B: It was highly compartmented and on a need to know. And anyone with this knowledge would be terminated with the usual extreme prejudice if they even hinted at it. The recent business with the Brits is pure circus but the White House loves it?

A: It's so blatantly stupid that it will fall apart of its own weight. The Atta attacks are believable because they carried them out. There was the proof, right on television but the story about the bombs? Who will believe that one? And we had no knowledge of this and if there had been a real ongoing probe, for sure we would have heard all about it. And you? Did you hear anything?

B: After the fact and we agree: no one really believes this. It will go away?

A: That's usual. But on the earlier business, remember we kept you right up to the mark. And don't believe that the Bush people wouldn't throw all of you into the sea over this if it ever came out. You would say you warned them and they would deny it. And where is the proof? You burned it. And where are you then? They will toss a sop to public opinion and sack the lot of you.

B: The DCI kept his word and his silence and they have no reason to push this any further. God knows what it might turn up. There could have been other warnings?

A: There were. From the Germans, the French, Putin, Egypt, Morocco and God knows who else. They are bloody lucky it didn't blow up in their face. But I can repeat that we are not on the stove this time. You know, anti-Israeli feelings are running high now and the public will be ready to believe anything bad. I don?t want to have to explain that of course we knew what they were up to. After all, we have the right to defend our citizens against terrorism, but you all knew what we were doing and we kept telling you what was coming. You know that, don't deny it.

B: I'm certainly not and I assure you, there will be no trouble from there. The White House will not be able to deny we told them and we will not be able to deny you told us?.

A: In plenty of time to stop it. We could never understand why they did nothing but on the other hand, it suited them to have excuses, didn't it?

B: Excuses? For what?

A: Reasons, it should have been reasons. Now, they had an excuse for their stupid wars.

B: You did benefit from removing Iraq from the game, didn't you?

A: Of course, but this thing was never thought out and look at where things are now. It?s going to be a disaster for all of us. Of course if we win in Lebanon and gain the buffer zone and frighten Syria into minding its business,
all and good but if not, this is a huge cancer that can grow.

RETROSPECTIVE

In January of 2000, a meeting of high-level al Qaeda personnel took place in Kuala Lumpur. According to the official CIA report, this is where the attacks on the USS Cole and World Trade Center were put forward.. The Kuala Lumpur meeting was monitored by Malaysian intelligence at the request of the CIA. The CIA was able to determine the identities of the participants, if not the entire agenda. Among those attending: were Ramzi Binalshibh, a student in Germany who then returned there and supposedly organized the Hamburg cell led by Atta, Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi. They subsequently entered the United States and moved around the country freely for 18 months, before they successfully hijacked the American Airlines commercial aircraft that was flown into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001,

Alhmihdhar's story is especially incredible because he left and reentered the United States at least twice more, once traveling to Germany to meet Binalshibh, and once going to Yemen, where the CIA believes he helped prepare the bombing of the USS Cole. Although he was identified as a suspect in the Cole bombing soon after that attack, the CIA never told the FBI or the INS anything about either him or Alhazmi until late August, 2001 -- after he had reentered the United States yet again. This proved to be far too late to apprehend Alhazmi.

Further the CIA also did not inform the German authorities about its suspicions regarding Binalshibh., where they could have connected him to the other members of the "Hamburg cell" that included the WTC suicide pilots, Mohamed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi.

The CIA did monitor Binalshibh long enough to connect him to Atta, because CIA had Mohamed Atta under surveillance in Hamburg starting in January 2000. This surveillance continued until Atta applied for and received a U.S. entry visa from the U.S. embassy in Berlin (on May 18, 2000) and flew to the United States out of Prague in June.

In October of 2000, two Mossad cells of six Egyptian and Yemeni- born Jews, started training at a secret base in Israel's Negev Desert with the purpose of penetrating Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network, both in Europe (where they were known to be functioning in Hamburg, Germany) and the United States where a known bin Laden cell had been identified as being organized. It is generally known that the Mossad has penetrated every Arab and Muslim organization and would have had little problem in finding any number of fanatics to carry out a suicide mission in the belief they were serving Allah. Indeed, recent news reports contended that not all of the hijackers knew their mission would end in death.

One team flew to Amsterdam and were under the control of Mossad's Europe Station. This is based at Schipol Airport within the El Al complex. They later made contact in Hamburg with Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker on September 11.

The second group flew directly to New York. From there they traveled south to Florida and infiltrated the Bin Laden organization. In the town of Hollywood, Florida, they identified the two former Hamburg students and later terror pilots, Mohammed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi. The Mossad team lived in the vicinity of the apartment of the two seemingly normal flight school students, observing them around the clock.

On August 17th, 2001, the Mossad team in Europe flew with some of the Hamburg terrorists into Boston, a month before the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.. Mossad agents had learned from the CIA that the leader of this group, Hanan Serfati, had rented several dwellings. "One of Serfati's apartments was located on the corner of 701st St. and 21st Ave. [sic] in Hollywood, right near the apartment of Atta and al-Shehi.", The chief Israeli agent was residing near the Hollywood post office where the terrorists had a mailbox. The Mossad also had its sights on Atta?s accomplice Khalid al-Midhar, with whom the CIA was also familiar, but allowed to run free. The Mossad team kept Atta under continuous surveillance while he was attending flight school in Florida in 2000 and early 2001. The initial penetration was followed by these agents, acting on specific orders from the Mossad, assisting the Atta people in developing their plans to attack ?important American government and financial centers.? The Mossad agents were fully conversant with the plans of this group but, although asked to participate, declined to do so, claiming they were engaged in other, ?more important? activities. The Mossad warned their American counterparts several times about the terrorists, especially about al-Midhar.

The Mossad team had established an attack on the U.S. was "imminent". It reported this to its Tel Aviv controller through the Israeli Embassy in Washington using a system of (at that time) secure communications. The Mossad groups secret communications with the Israeli Embassy in Washington and Mossad units in Holland had been breached by DoD experts working with the NSA. The Central Intelligence Agency also was involved in this interdiction One way for the CIA to request assistance from the Mossad to keep an eye on, or attempt to penetrate the Atta group without itself violating the ban on activities inside the United States. An allied spy agency could violate American law on the CIA's behalf, and watch the suspect without needing to involve the FBI or any other domestic American agency, because the CIA was extremely jealous of its perceived rivals and kept a great deal of otherwise very important information strictly private.

On August 24, 2001, the head of the Israeli Mossad reported the imminence of an Arab attack against American targets to the Israeli Embassy and the Mossad connections inside the CIA, and a similar report was made by the same agency on September 7, 2001 and provided the United States with a list of 19 potential terrorists, whom the Mossad believed were planning an imminent attack within the United States. At least four of the names on this list later turned up again as four of the 19 alleged Sept. 11 hijackers. On August. 23, 2001, the Israeli intelligence service Mossad presented to its American counterpart a list of names of 19 identified Muslim terrorists who were then living in the United States and were planning to carry out an attack by hijacked commercial aircraft against specific, listed targets in Washington, D.C. in less than a month probably the second week in September? According to a highly-classified CIA report on this issue, Mossad agents in the United States, working with the knowledge of the FBI and the CIA, had followed four of the 19 hijackers, including Almihdhar., and in Hollywood, Florida, had penetrated the group using agents fluent in Arabic and born in Arab countries.

According to the CIA (and subsequent FBI internal, and highly classified, reports,) Arab terrorists and suspected terror cells lived in Phoenix, Arizona, as well as in Miami and Hollywood, Florida from December 2000 to April 2001 in direct proximity to the Israeli spy cells which had penetrated said alleged terrorist groups with their own, Arab-speaking agents

In early September, 2001, Mossad Chief Efraim Halevy sent a warning to the CIA of the possibility of such an attack. The warning was noted and acknowledged. But the then-CIA chief George Tenet has described it as "too non-specific." The FBI was also informed. Halevy sent a second alert to the CIA that reached Washington on September 7.
www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2481.htm

See: Pro-Israel PAC Contributions to 2006 Congressional Candidates
www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2471.htm

See our Inside the White House archive
Reply With Quote
  (#64 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
magnolia's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Last Online: 13th March 2008
Join Date: Thu May 2007
View magnolia's Photo Album
Default 13th March 2008

If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks...will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.

... The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burdens ever accumulating. -Thomas Jefferson



History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance. -James Madison



If congress has the right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations. -Andrew Jackson



The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity. -Abraham Lincoln
Issue of currency should be lodged with the government and be protected from domination by Wall Street. We are opposed to...provisions [which] would place our currency and credit system in private hands. - Theodore Roosevelt



Despite these warnings, Woodrow Wilson signed the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. A few years later he wrote: I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men. -Woodrow Wilson







Years later, reflecting on the major banks' control in Washington, President Franklin Roosevelt paid this indirect praise to his distant predecessor President Andrew Jackson, who had "killed" the 2nd Bank of the US (an earlier type of the Federal Reserve System). After Jackson's administration the bankers' influence was gradually restored and increased, culminating in the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Roosevelt knew this history.

The real truth of the matter is,as you and I know, that a financial
element in the large centers has owned the government ever since
the days of Andrew Jackson... -Franklin D. Roosevelt
(in a letter to Colonel House, dated November 21, 1933)


Reply With Quote
  (#65 (permalink)) Old
Registered Member
 
Mr Aoun's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,049
Thanks: 0
Thanked 85 Times in 61 Posts
Last Online: 11th June 2009
Join Date: Mon Oct 2006
View Mr Aoun's Photo Album
Default 13th March 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abu Ruman View Post
I also read about some actress (I forgot her name) who thinks 9/11 and the moon landing, were both conspiracy/hoax (for the very same reasons of 'logical impossibility' in both scenarios).
yeh some french lady that recently won an oscar.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Orange Room - forum.tayyar.org The Orange Room Main Forums Regional and International Politics


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Forums Directory