Was 9/11 the biggest scam of the century?

[Mr Aoun]

Originally Posted by Abu Ruman

Ya, well, the thing is I have footage + infinite testimonies confirming that two physically existing aircrafts crashed into those buildings that day.

So no, very bad comparison. Not even close.

It was a very nice try though. Very moving.

I never said planes never went into those buildings LOOL. I won't get bogged down in arguing with such a simple minded individual, because it'll result in a circular time wasting exercise. So YOU WIN. congrats !!

[GeaGea SkyWalkeR]

Originally Posted by Abu Ruman

Buddy, its very very simple: you dont have evidence. Dead end.

There is nothing opaque about this. If you dont have proof, then its a shut-case.

I'd really like to open a thread on the moon-landing now. This is very exciting.

Like wise Abu Ruman, Like wise

And by going off that you cant blame anyone yet

[Abu Ruman]

Originally Posted by Mr Aoun

I never said planes never went into those buildings LOOL. I won't get bogged down in arguing with such a simple minded individual, because it'll result in a circular time wasting exercise. So YOU WIN. congrats !!

Simple-minded? Thats funny considering you take what is a theory (the equivlent of the moon-landing hoax, and I know you hate the comparison, but you cant shrug it off, sorry) as an axiomatic truth.

But ya, I'm obviously the simple-minded one, Mr. Sherlock Aoun.

[Abu Ruman]

Here is the document for the scientific study that was done: http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf

Apparently, I'm not the only one with a simple mind who thinks that external factors (such as debris, various fuel leakages, etc.) might have catalyzed the rate of burning and destruction of the building.

But then again, what match am I against the local Agatha Christie detective team, who have humbled me with their 'complex-minded' knowledge which my 'simple-mindedness' cannot compute.

[Mr Aoun]

Originally Posted by Abu Ruman

Here is the document for the scientific study that was done: http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf

Obviously you didn't watch the first video in my post (post #8) where fema is made to look very amateur.

Similarly http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=6017
and http://www.ae911truth.org/speakings.php#speak44

In fact, there are more scientists and architectural structural engineers that favor the demolition theory based on the facts of the collapses, than your theorists. Now why is that i wonder? Perhaps because hypothetico-deductivity based on observation (since conveniently within days all evidence was turned into recycled scrap metal and shipped off to India) clearly provide empirical evidence that two planes hitting those buildings simply couldn't have caused them to collapse. fema has been red-faced and refuses to go up against those scientists in an open-debate. If i was them, i wouldn't either.

[Youchka]

Originally Posted by Mr Aoun

gas lines? lol, that in itself is a 'theory that sounds nice'

9/11 Truth: MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8XToX7aSdg[/YOUTUBE]

9/11 Truth: What Happened to Building 7
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4[/YOUTUBE]

What i'm still confused about the most, is why there hasn't been any footage of the plane hitting the pentagon. You'd expect the most secure building on earth has around the clock video surveillance of every brick ... but nop, apparently there's no such thing.

The second video is very interesting. This Silverstein guy included acts of terrorism in his insurance. Now of course some may think well he had a vision or coincidence but I find it hardly a coincidence that he takes the 99 year lease the same year, includes the terrorism clause in his insurance.

What about what Guliani's speech. Didn't he say that the towers were gonna collaps even before they did? How did he know? He was also measuring the temperature of the heat inside the building?

And again, no one had answered yet why the hek was building 7 demolished in such a way. It had a couple of small fires so, no plane hit it, so what's the excuse? Maybe Mr. Silverstein needed the space for his new project

[Osiris]

Conspiracy theories.. this is what we are good at..

[Colter]

If 9/11 was an inside Job you would think that Bush could have hidden some WMD's inside of Iraq to "discover" to legitimize the invasion? But no, we didn't find a darn thing.

I think the 9/11 conspiracy theory itself is a conspiracy to create suspicion and mistrust among the masses.

We all need to denounce wars and respect each others faiths and cultures. More suspicion and revenge will not help anyone.

We need to teach people the truth, that terror doesn't represent Islam, and invasion of others countries does not represent Jesus.

A great leader is rising in America, his name is Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.

This man may well be the next leader of the free world.





Colter

[Danny Z]

This thread is still open?

[Youchka]

Originally Posted by Colter

If 9/11 was an inside Job you would think that Bush could have hidden some WMD's inside of Iraq to "discover" to legitimize the invasion? But no, we didn't find a darn thing.

I think the 9/11 conspiracy theory itself is a conspiracy to create suspicion and mistrust among the masses.

We all need to denounce wars and respect each others faiths and cultures. More suspicion and revenge will not help anyone.

We need to teach people the truth, that terror doesn't represent Islam, and invasion of others countries does not represent Jesus.

A great leader is rising in America, his name is Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.

This man may well be the next leader of the free world.





Colter

I opened this thread to have an answer that shuts my wondering. So what do you think happened to building 7 and why didn't we see a plane in the footage of the Pentagon explosion. Simple questions need simple answers.