Quote:
Originally Posted by milouvr3  the workers were led by leaders such as Karl Marx and other, how(leaders) succeeded to convince the people by there thought, the same for Fidel Castro and Che Guevara. these leaders just started the revolution and then they revolution has grown. so you need a leader, a people willing to change the system because they know by reason than the system is wrong. this reason come with the education/culture (ثقافة)
in KSA we have a people with an Islamic culture, so it's obvious that the people will not revolt against the king, because for them, he is the representor of god on earth, so if you want for this people to revolt, you need to tell them and convince them that there's better systems or ways to live (e.g: democracy). and while the interest of the system is that the people stay holding his thought about the king and his system, so the people need to self explore the others system, then he choose. so if a group of people see that democracy is the best for them, they should work undercover for a while, until the group is big enough to start the revolution. |
True a revolution needs its leaders but the leaders education is secondary. The leaders should posses more of charismatic and galvanising attitude. There are some revolutions started by the people and the leaders took advantage. Viktor Yushchenko was boring throughout most of the orange revolution. His speeches in Independence Square in Kiev were keenly anticipated, but a few minutes after he began talking, after he had started rambling on about Seneca or bee-keeping or whatever, people generally began chatting among themselves. He seemed to be an honest and clean leader Ukraine the conclusion might be that a revolutionary leader and that was enough to command the trust of the masses who trusted him to bring about change.