Quote:
Originally Posted by Learned  In any case, I find it highly unlikely that you would know anything about how good or bad either candidate potentially was for their own country and people, because your rhetoric and attitude towards Iran is reflective of an individual whose views are shaped by slanted Western media characterization of Iran's politics and people. |
Actually, you might be right that i don't follow closely all the details of the iranian politics and as little powers as the president has, i honestly believe that having a moderate in the presidency could directly lead to less tensions in the region.
Iran and the middle east doesn't need a cowboy controlling Iran and running the country down the drain for the sake of heroic semantics along the likes of Chavez and Morales that have brought nothing more to the country as a such.
Najad is much more interested in scoring points against the US and Israel than to improve the economic and political conditions of his people, Iran's economy is as bad if not worse than that of the arab gul states with 75% of the exports being oil and gas leaving Iran at the total mercy of the world markets and one of the reason of the current mini revolt against najad is the populist economic policy that almost brought the country to the brink of collapse b/c of the high inflation and collapse in world oil prices.