Quote:
Originally Posted by MaKhassak  Ana3arabi and learned, what happened in Iran was a selection and not an election |
Why? Because the so-called "reformists'" candidate did not win ? :)
If he had won it would've been elections not selections? Wow, that's a nice way of judging fairness of elections, apparently, the ballot box is not what shows how many millions support whom..... apparently there is a better way of knowing the numbers than elections. If so, let those who claim that these were selections not elections based on the outcome, tell us about this new technology. :)
Quote:
|
one of the news agencies declared najad the winner with 65% of the votes before the polling stations were even closed.
|
Um, and some of the news agencies declared muwalet and mu3arada candidates winners in many districts during Lebanese elections. That does not mean that if their opponents won in that district, there is something fishy about it.... also, it was Moussavi himself , if I can recall, that announced he had won the elections before the polls had CLOSED.. we are not even talking about news agencies but the candidate himself... :)
Quote:
|
A majority of iranians want reform
|
Yeah, they do. They want more reform with Pres. Ahmadinejad. That is why they voted for him. In their overwhelming majority. ;-)
Quote:
|
but you obviously care much more about how much money iran is sending you
|
Obviously you know more about money "I" am getting from Iran than I do... why don't you elaborate.. :)
Quote:
|
how good or bad this man is for his own country and people
|
The Iranians are the only judges of that, and they did make their choice clear. :)