View Single Post
  (#13 (permalink)) Old
Ana3arabi!
Registered Member
 
Ana3arabi!'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 510
Thanks: 431
Thanked 91 Times in 72 Posts
Last Online: 2nd July 2009
Join Date: Tue May 2008
View Ana3arabi!'s Photo Album
Default 14th June 2009

I am very happy that Pres. Ahmadinejad won. He would do Iran more good than Mousavi , because he has given Iran a more forceful position regionally and internationally and now Iran is a very strong country that does not play second fiddle to anyone and does not bow to others' demands, whereas if the so-called "reformist" had won, this would've happened and there would've been lots of giveaways of Iran's rights without anything in return, in the name of wooing america.... and wooing america would not have produced a result because we all know in whose pocket america is to begin with..

what i find ridiculous is that people who would've said the elections are free and fair if Moussavi had won , are now singing an opposite tune and claiming it was pre-arranged. What a ridiculous thing to do, judge elections' fairness based on the results. It shows the west has bad intentions and doesn't know a thing about Iran. Fact is, Iran is not just Tehran. Iran is Shiraz, it is Esfahan, it is Yazd, it is Baluchistan, it is the poor, conservative villages and towns all over the country where Pres. Ahmadinejad also has strong support. Just because all you see on TV is well-dressed supporters of Moussavi does not mean Moussavi has more support.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ana3arabi! For This Useful Post:
LebReporter (14th June 2009), Xguy (14th June 2009)