[Youchka]

Originally Posted by sailormoon

1st- I know that Amine Gemayel named Aoun as an interim minister , but remember that half of the Lebanese (namely the majority of the Muslims) considered this nomination as ilegal, thus the creation of the Hoss government. In 1989 after the Taef agreement Aoun was considered as a "rebel" while Hrawi, Lahoud, Berri, Hoss and the parliament (deputies who in fact were elected in 1972) were representing the "shar3ieh". It s not that I agree with it, but that is the official version.

Yeah the official version was also "daroure, char3e, mouakat" for 15 years. Was it the RIGHT version? Was it the PEOPLE's wish?

2nd- I went to tayyar.org and I read "bernemej el tayyar: na7wa el joumhouriya al thalitha" which was nothing but FPM s program of reforms , and contains points such as agricultural reforms , educational, economical etc... but in any place there is a clear explanation about the third republic.
What I want to know is what will be the constitutional change in the III republic its differences with the IInd and the Ist , its sectarian repartition , and its position towards main issues such as HA s weapons, the Palestinians etc...

This is our 3rd republic. A republic is how things are being done on all levels not only constitution wise.
Regarding changing the constitution, you mean the Taef, well nothing can be done if we do not have 2/3 of the parliament, therefore, both Chiite and Sunni MPs should agree with us to change anything. So since we are preaching to modify president's salahiyet and since Hariri have said he is with, then no problem there right? He will join us in doing that.
Regarding the sectarian repartition, no one talked about that and no one will dare touch it. Chiite are around 30% of the population, on their own they can do nothing. Christians charho. Sunnis as well, unless they naturalize Palestinians and thus become majority. Until then, no one cna do anything on his own, so rest assured.

3- HA has hit the streets the 7 of may 2007 ,the message of their mini civil war was : "we have the power to storm any place in this country if you mess with us , we ll hit the streets and use our weapons against you if you take any decision that doesn t please us" on the 7 of may it was the Beirut Sunnis , tomorrow, for a reason or another it may be you.

NO the thing that you DO NOT WANT to understand is that, HA did not hit the streets because "someone took a decision they did not like". Siniora was glued on his lousy chair despite all the manifestations, and HA did not do anything. The whole July 20006 war happened and the involvement of many of the so called neo patriots was clear to HA and they did not do anything about it. What the 14 feb were preparing was big, they were asking (as the idiot Marouni asked 2 days ago) to put HA int he face of the army, which will lead UNDOUBTEDLY to a war. HA in less than an hour saved the country from a war.
As for the mini civil war, whenever there is a war, it is between 2 factions, I do not think HA and Amal were fighting their shadows in Beirut. Walaw ma Joumblat bi 3admit lsseno said that Hariri had brought men from Akkar to fight. Why did he do that? 3a assess you guys preach of the dawleh, and kiwa el amen and whatever **** you talk about, why did you need mercenaries to defend you if you did not know that you were actually going to do something miserable as your stupid HA communication decision?

So flekouna bi May 7, the rats taht Hariri brought were kicked out. If HA and Amal wanted to really yfaz3o they could have done much much more, just take a look at what happened in Halba, and you can have an idea. But the difference is that HA was not in it to have a war, whereas Hariri thugs who have no brains actually did a massacre and if the opposition was not wise, a real war would have taken place in the country.