View Single Post
  (#72 (permalink)) Old
Frisbeetarian
Registered Member
 
Frisbeetarian's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,839
Thanks: 396
Thanked 198 Times in 171 Posts
Last Online: 5 Hours Ago
Join Date: Thu Aug 2007
View Frisbeetarian's Photo Album
Default 25th May 2009

Quote:
All indigenous people throughout ME and North Africa who still exist shell come forth and rise to free their native lands from occupiers the same way Jews are freeing Israel today.
It is very much idiotic on your part to pursue this direct argument, wanting reinstate your land because your people called it home over 4000 years ago. Maybe we should instate an anchor point as to the time period Palestine and Israel should be appropriated to which people. I say that anchor point should be the French Revolution, which set forth the development of human rights and set out the effort to build a somewhat understanding world. Using this anchor point, it is no longer moral no legal (Use the U.N sanction argument and ill call you a hypocrite) to forcibly remove a large population from its own land with the guise of replacing it with another, thus producing enormous amounts of torment on the populace to be relocated. Does anyone object at this reference point?

Does anyone object at this reference point? I see it as a natural reference to take in order to make sense of this debate and produce valid results. I believe that we cant go back in reference 4000 years, because then we wouldnt be taking into consideration human life and supposed human rights.