Quote:
You are asking all the wrong or rather irrelevant questions.
You and I do not need to know technical aspects of WP action simply because none of us represents internationally recognized and respected entity. Our opinions do not count when criminal charges are leveled. However, HRW's does and it is their job to investigate and report. When they will report we will be able to appreciate real situation rather than engage in speculations.
BTW, after HRW reports it will be burden on IDF to respond whether by agreeing or by refuting the charges but eventually if there is no agreement everything may come down to court hearings.
Alternatively each of us does not have to wait for it but simply assume how thing are according to our personal bias(es). And this is exactly what we are doing.
|
My questions are irrelevant. Really now? Werent you the one that compared wp to firecrackers, were you not? And do my questions, yes or no, contradict with your comparison? If yes, so according to your logic, your comparison is also irrelevant.
Hmmmm
. Well now Sir, if you one would answer my above questions and sees that wp does cause a huge amount of damage on skin tissue, and couple these revelations with the fact that Israel used it on an area abundant with people. Well now Sir, one would not need outside sources telling that throwing this kind of burning chemical on gaza (the world most densily populated area) is wrong, would he?