Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GMA forever chafic the stronger side always decides for peace and not the weaker side. And since Israel is the strongest side here, well we have to wait until the Israelis are ready for peace without shooting ourselves in the foot. |
To be honest here, I think what you said above is totally ambiguous. Israel has repeatedly stated that it seeks peace with Lebanon, and the Lebanese reply is split between two opinions: Annihilating Israel and being the last country to sign peace with it.
Talking about "ready for peace" is another ambiguous term; what do you qualify as "being ready for peace". It's a process, talks and negotiations.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GMA forever As for Nasrallah pledging the annihilation of Israel, well that is his right as long as we have no peace with the israelis and the israelis are a big threat to us Lebanese. The day a peace treaty is signed is the day when you have the right to prosecute anyone pledging the annihilation of a peaceful neighbouring country. |
So it's an infinite loop here because once you enter in a conflict with someone, you never get out, unless one annihilates the other.
Seriously GMA forever, what about negotiating, talking, trying to solve out problems?
And doesn't applying this rationale to Israel, implies applying it to anyone there might be a political or ideological disagreement (enmity) with?