View Single Post
  (#59 (permalink)) Old
joseph_lubnan
Registered Member
 
joseph_lubnan's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,778
Thanks: 118
Thanked 434 Times in 282 Posts
Last Online: 11 Hours Ago
Join Date: Fri Mar 2005
View joseph_lubnan's Photo Album
Default 1st June 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by chafic View Post
Actually, what I said is the following: "Bottom line: Does Lebanon wants peace or not? Does Hezbollah want peace or not? The rest is irrelevant quibbling.", so yes, the decision right now is Hezbollah's. But theoretically, two major Lebanese groups, Hezbollah and the loyalists (let's say represented by Siniora) refuse any peace talks or agreement with Israel.

The first wants to annihilate Israel, the other wants to be the last Arab country to ever sign a peace with Israel. In that context, presenting the "bargain over the weapons" as a raison d'etre for Hezbollah's weapons is an ultimate absurdity.
Maybe the government should declare that " it wants to open independent peace negotiations with Israel much like sister Syria has"... (though you cannot negotiate something you do not control!)... What would be the reaction of HA I wonder? which part of Lebanon would they invade this time around in response!

The state of Lebanon is nothing less than a HA hostage today...
Reply With Quote