Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief  Yesterday night, our government came out with this piece of art
Lets say, in absolute terms, if we want to take the lebanese case as an independant entity of the neibourhood, if we want to consider lebanon as a secular state, where democracy rules, if we want to consider HA as a militia, not as a resistance , that this decision was fair enough.
But what about the palestenians weapons? Inside the camps or outside it. How many armed militia there are in the camps? Can our army enter the camp? Are the palestinians abiding by the laws of our country?
What danger is more imminent? the danger of the palestinians? or the "danger" of the lebanese? Shame on our government who has no sign of consistency in his decisions. Shame on the people who woke up today clapping their hands.
ya3ne I would loved to have a statement about the palestinians weapons. ya 3ayb el shoum. now HA are ennemies inside the state, but what about the palestinians ? Anybody cares about their weapons? |
both should give up their weapons