Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief  Why the government wants HA's weapons first and not palestinian weapons? |
Because it was their part of the deal to swap the "majority".
They were supposed to complete this task probably by the end of 2005... 2.5years of delay is not tolerated by their silent partner...
Quote:
What danger is more imminent? the danger of the palestinians? or the "danger" of the lebanese? Shame on our government who has no sign of consistency in his decisions. Shame on the people who woke up today clapping their hands.
ya3ne I would loved to have a statement about the palestinians weapons. ya 3ayb el shoum. now HA are ennemies inside the state, but what about the palestinians ? Anybody cares about their weapons? |
The imminent danger is the militias rearming. we are repeating the same pre-1975 pattern where militias were flooding the country with their weapon warehouses preparing for the D day. And the army was given the order to just sit and watch...
People are calling for the control of weapons? go for multitasking and target all armed parties. But given that all protagonists are involved in the rearming race, this won't happen any time sooner unless the army takes things in hand without wait for the necessary orders which is not an easy task neither...