Quote:
Originally Posted by texasleb  I agree I would rather have a stranger disarmed before a fellow citizen, but I will have to reference my post again to tell you how I feel... The shiites were no the only ones that suffered under the hands of the palestinians a lot of people all over the country did, and obviously all other armed groups "officially" disarmed so why not them...
neither weapons of either group achieved anything.. I will throw a little curve ball here... can you prove that if hizballah did not exist that Israel would have stayed in the south.. you're answer might be yes, but you can';t prove it.. its the chicken and the egg theory.. so them liberating the south which is what i believe you are trying to reference.. might not have been needed if they just never kept their weapons..
not sure if palestinian weapons were ever used against me.. i was very young and lived in the metn so more than likely it was my fellow chrisitans shooting at our buildings... and the syrians of course can't forget them ;) ... and in regards to hizballah they have not personally used there weapons against me ... but because of their weapons, armed aggression caused me to re-live the evacuation i endured when I was young and running away from lebanon from Jounieh.. I never wanted to relive that .. unfortunately I did and It will stay with me forever.. |
Good, your personal experience that you do not want to re-live again even though its a minor inconvenience of having to jump on a boat compared to the death and destruction caused by palestinians should now been seen from another perspective...why would the southern community want to re-live again a life under palestinian control? What assurance can the government provide for them not to "re-live" their misery again?
P.S: Feel free to replace "Palestinian "with "Israeli" anywhere in the sentence above.