View Single Post
  (#1 (permalink)) Old
Chief
Orange Room Supporter
 
Chief's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,903
Thanks: 117
Thanked 460 Times in 215 Posts
Last Online: 17 Hours Ago
Join Date: Sun May 2005
View Chief's Photo Album
Default Why the governemnt wants HA's weapons first and not Palestinian weapons? - 6th May 2008

Yesterday night, our government came out with this piece of art

Lets say, in absolute terms, if we want to take the lebanese case as an independant entity of the neibourhood, if we want to consider lebanon as a secular state, where democracy rules, if we want to consider HA as a militia, not as a resistance , that this decision was fair enough.

But what about the palestenians weapons? Inside the camps or outside it. How many armed militia there are in the camps? Can our army enter the camp? Are the palestinians abiding by the laws of our country?

What danger is more imminent? the danger of the palestinians? or the "danger" of the lebanese? Shame on our government who has no sign of consistency in his decisions. Shame on the people who woke up today clapping their hands.

ya3ne I would loved to have a statement about the palestinians weapons. ya 3ayb el shoum. now HA are ennemies inside the state, but what about the palestinians ? Anybody cares about their weapons?
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Chief For This Useful Post:
J_Raad1450 (6th May 2008), Mich© (6th May 2008), Qwiw (7th May 2008), sierra (10th June 2008), Tartaruga (6th May 2008), Zghertewe (7th May 2008), †.) (6th May 2008)
Sponsored Links