Quote:
Originally Posted by AlGhaliboon  Does being a minority mean the majority is the occupier? What if the minority is the one doing the occupation? By that token the Arabs are occupying "israeli" land and all the "israelis" are doing are securing their existence and liberating "their" lands from the occupiers? What about the massacres against the Azerbaijanis? How does that go under the self-defense and the liberation of "your" land?
It has nothing to do with sectarianism, but you are using double standards.
And Iran did not support the Armenians against the Azerbaijanis, they did not wish the conflict to spill over, so they did not intervene. Big difference. |
being a minority ? it was a province during the soviet era , and it had a majority of armenians in it .
before breaking apart the soviet union , they joined the karabkh province to azerbeijan , back then the war started , when the USSR fell apart , armenians didnt have anything to do with the azerbeijanis and wanted to join the armenian country , the war started ,
so you cant call them a minority , since they were the majority in their province , and there wasnt any azerbaijani state , it was a province
( actually its an iranian province ) .
+ check the old churches , its a proof that the armenian lands were armenian lands long time ago , before there was any population called azeris.